The morality of organization versus organized members

Seven experiments demonstrate that framing an organizational entity (the target) as an organization ("an organization comprised of its constituent members") versus its members ("constituent members comprising an organization") increases attribution of responsibility to the target following a negative outcome, despite identical information conveyed. Specifically, the target in the organization (vs. members) frame was perceived to have more control over a negative outcome, which led to an increased attribution of responsibility (Studies 1-3). This effect surfaced for both for-profits and nonprofits (Study 5). However, when the target in the members frame had explicit control over the outcome (Study 3), or when participants held strong beliefs in individual free will (Study 4), the effect of frame on responsibility attenuated. To the extent that framing increased perceptions of control, punishment for the target also increased (Studies 6a and 6b). By demonstrating how a subtle shift in framing can impact people's perceptions and judgments of organizations, we reveal important knowledge about how people understand organizations and the psychological nature of organizational and group perception. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Control (management · Epistemology · Management · Morality · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

• Organizational Top Dog (vs. Underdog) Narratives Increase the Punishment of Corporate Moral Transgressions

  Open Access•Anika Schumacher, Robert Mai•Journal of Business Ethics•2024

  Incluir item

• Anti-Egalitarians Are Lenient Toward Corporate Misconduct

  Open Access•Janet Lees, Simone Tang et al.•Social Psychological and…•2026

  Incluir item

• Feeling empathy for organizations

  Open Access•Simone Tang, Kurt Gray•Journal of Experimental Social…•2021

  Incluir item