The Influence of Textural and Timbral Factors on the Ability of Music Majors to Detect Performance Errors
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10201243 |
|---|---|
| Autores | James L Byo (Louisiana State University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1993 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 156-167 |
| Data de publicação | 1993-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Research in Music Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-4294 • E-ISSN: 1945-0095 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3345405 |
| OpenAlex | W2072082776 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 14 |
| Referências citadas | 8 |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of textural and timbral factors on graduate and undergraduate music majors' ability to detect performance errors. Specifically, subjects' discrimination of pitch and rhythm errors in music excerpts that were counterbalanced for error type, textural placement of errors (soprano, alto, tenor, and bass voices), and timbre (single and multiple) was examined. In the development of a stimulus audiotape for error detection, the Yamaha SY77 digital synthesizer was used to record and perform two contrasting, six-measure music excerpts selected from the wind band literature. The original excerpts were edited to include purposeful errors resulting in a stimulus of 20 total excerpts, 16 of which included performance errors. Subjects (N - 60) listened to the recorded excerpts and attempted to identify pitch and rhythm errors by circling appropriate places in the scores. Results of a four-factor analysis of variance with repeated measures on correct responses indicated significant main effects of error type (subjects were more discerning of rhythm errors) and timbre (subjects were more discerning of errors in the single-timbre condition) and no effects regarding voice placement and degree status. There was a significant three-way interaction among the variables of error type, textural placement, and timbre. Additionally, descriptive comparisons were made concerning incorrect responses
Acoustics · Art · Audiology · Cognitive psychology · Musical · Rhythm · Speech recognition · Stimulus (psychology · Timbre · Visual arts · Computer Science · Diverse Music Education Insights · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Musicians’ Health and Performance · Psychology
The Influence of Tonal and Atonal Contexts on Error Detection Accuracy
Effects of Listening Conditions, Error Types, and Ensemble Textures on Error Detection Skills
Effects of Self-Assessment and Successive Approximations on “Knowing” and “Valuing” Selected Keyboard Skills
Knowledgeable Listeners’ Assessments of Auditory Recordings of Music Practice
The Effects of Error-Detection Practice on Keyboard Sight-Reading Achievement of Undergraduate Music Majors
Inattentional deafness in music
The Effects of Texture and Number of Parts on the Ability of Music Majors to Detect Performance Errors
The Effect of Focus of Attention on Error Detection Ability
Effects of Contextual Sight-Singing and Aural Skills Training on Error-Detection Abilities
Effects of Multiple Listenings on Error-Detection Acuity in Multivoice, Multitimbral Musical Examples
Effects of Pitch and Rhythm Priming Tasks on Accuracy and Fluency During Sight-Reading
Effects of Score Study and Conducting Gesture on Collegiate Musicians’ Ability to Detect Errors in a Choral Score
Melody, not Beat Perception, Predicts Rhythmic Error Detection
Effects of Score Study Style on Beginning Conductors' Error-Detection Abilities
Programed Instruction in Score Reading Skills
Music Abilities and Experiences as Predictors of Error-Detection Skill
Self-Instructional Drill Materials for Student Conductors
The Effects of Conducting Experience and Programmed Materials on Error-Detection Scores of College Conducting Students
Programmed Instruction using Band Literature to Teach Pitch and Rhythm Error Detection to Music Education Students
Computer-Assisted Instruction in Pitch and Rhythm Error Detection
| Obras citantes distintas | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,47 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1996 - 2026 (31) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 14 |