Of Practicalities and Perspective
What Is Fair in Group Decision Making
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10229292 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Elizabeth Jacobs (0000-0002-3905-6832), P Niels Christensen (Radford University), Radmila Prislin (San Diego State University) |
| Ano | 2009 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 383-407 |
| Data de publicação | 2009-06-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-4537 • E-ISSN: 1540-4560 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01605.x |
| OpenAlex | W2005075039 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 50 |
Establishing fair procedures to regulate intragroup disagreements should engender cooperation while inhibiting conflict . Yet what is a “fair” procedure might vary for members of different factions . To understand perceptions of fairness in group decision making , the present research developed and utilized the Fair Group Procedures Scale (FGPS). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four‐factor structure along two dimensions: the means of distributing decision‐making power (proportionality to equality) and the normative value of the approach (desirable to undesirable) . Data suggest that deeming a particular decision‐making procedure “fair” is predicted by one's majority/minority position within a group . Furthermore , experimental data suggest that social change (i . e ., reversals of majority/minority positions) reduces the discrepancies between factions . Results support the socially constructed nature of fairness and its potential role in intragroup conflict
Confirmatory factor analysis · Developmental psychology · Economics · Exploratory factor analysis · Group Decision Making · Normative · Perception · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Position (finance · Proportionality (law · Psychometrics · Structural equation modeling · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Cultural Differences and Values · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Social identity and intergroup relations
Procedural Justice
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Democracies
Informal social communication.
Self and Collective
Prospect Theory
The Social Psychology of Groups
Inequity In Social Exchange
The Group Engagement Model
Social change in the aftermath of successful minority influence
Social Identification As a Determinant of Concerns About Individual-, Group-, and Inclusive-Level Justice
Conflict and Cooperation in Diverse Workgroups
Cooperation and Conflict within Groups
Conflict and Creativity in Groups
What's fair is fair--Or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice
Group conversion versus group expansion as modes of change in majority and minority positions
Voice, control, and procedural justice
A Handbook of Social Psychology
When reasons matter
The Self-Relevant Implications of the Group-Value Model
A Theory of Social Comparison Processes
What's fair is fair—Or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice
How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect
Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters
Realpolitik versus fair process
Attentional focus and locus of performance causality as determinants of equity behavior
From majority to minority and vice versa
Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice
College sophomores in the laboratory
Equity, Equality, and Need
Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes
The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
When Due Process Is of No Consequence
Procedural Justice in Majority-Minority Relations
The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior
| Citações por ano | 0,41 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2009 - 2026 (18) |
| Altamente citado | Não |