Artificial Intelligence and Japan’s Fifth Generation
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10322751 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Colin Garvey (0000-0002-7346-8873, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 88 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 619-658 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Pacific Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0030-8684 • E-ISSN: 1533-8584 |
| Editora | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/phr.2019.88.4.619 |
| OpenAlex | W2980138805 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
In 1982, Japan launched its Fifth Generation Computer Systems project (FGCS), designed to develop intelligent software that would run on novel computer hardware. As the first national, large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) research and development (R&D) project to be free from military influence and corporate profit motives, the FGCS was open, international, and oriented around public goods. Although the FGCS did not plan any commercialized technologies, many American computer experts portrayed it as an economic threat to U.S. dominance in computing and the global economy—and policymakers around the developed world believed them and funded AI projects of their own. Later, however, the FGCS was remembered as a failure. Why? This article recasts the FGCS as an interstice in the shift from a state-funded regime of American science organization to the neoliberal privatized regime of R&D now ascendant around the world. By exploring how notions of economic competitiveness and national security shaped R&D, this article reveals AI to be a product of contingent choices by multiple actors—nation-states, government bureaucracies, corporations, and individuals—rather than the outcome of deterministic technological forces
Bureaucracy · Business · Dominance (genetics · Economic growth · Economics · Government (linguistics · National security · Neoclassical economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Profit (economics · Asian Industrial and Economic Development · Chinese history and philosophy · Law
Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching
We Are All Stakeholders in an AI-supplemented World
Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector - a Research Agenda
From the “Desk Set” to “Doraemon”
Ethical artificial intelligence framework for a good AI society
The Development of AI Ethics in Japan
Unsavory medicine for technological civilization
Can artificial intelligence be decolonized
D'une révolution avortée à une autre? Les politiques québécoises en nanotechnologies et en IA au prisme de l'économie de la promesse
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |