Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Tides of Reform Revisited

Patterns in Making Government Work, 1945-2002

Dados Bibliográficos

ID10397806
AutoresPaul Light (New York University, autor correspondente), Paul C Light
Ano2006
Volume66
Fascículo1
Páginas6-19
Data de publicação2006-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00551.x
OpenAlexW2104075050
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas39
Referências citadas11

The past six decades have witnessed acceleration in both the number and variety of major administrative reform statutes enacted by Congress. This increase can be explained partly by the increased involvement of Congress, a parallel decrease in activity and resistance by the presidency, and heightened public distrust toward government. At least part of the variation in the tides or philosophies of reform involves a "field of dreams" effect in which the creation of new governmental structure during the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s generated increased interest in process reforms. However, part of the acceleration and variety of reform appears to be related to the lack of hard evidence of what actually works in improving government performance. Measured by federal employees' perceptions of organizational performance, what matters most is not whether organizations were reformed in the past, but whether organizations need reform in the future and can provide essential resources for achieving their mission

Distrust · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Public relations · Resistance (ecology · Statute · Variety (cybernetics · Work (physics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • The Myth of Bureaucratic Neutrality

    Open Access•Shannon Portillo, Domonic A Bearfield et al.•Review of Public Personnel…•2020

  • After the applause

    Open Access•Rory Shand, Steven Parker et al.•Public Management Review•2023

  • Performance management and hybridization of healthcare – case of the accountable care organization

    Open Access•Petra Kokko, Harri Laihonen•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2022

  • The Reformer's Spirit

    Open Access•Eva M Witesman, Eva Witesman et al.•Public Administration Review•2012

  • What has become of the audit explosion? Analyzing trends in oversight activities in the Canadian government

    Open Access•Catherine Liston‐Heyes, Luc Juillet•Public Administration•2021

  • Does increasing auditors' independence lead to more forceful public auditing? A study of a Canadian internal audit reform

    Open Access•Catherine Liston‐Heyes, Luc Juillet•Public Administration•2023

  • How to attract and retain the best in government

    Open Access•Pan Suk Kim, Pan Suk Kim Pan Suk Kim•International Review of…•2008

  • Microbrook, Mesobrook, Macrobrook

    Open Access•Sebastian Jilke, Anne Lisbeth Olsen et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2019

  • Energy research and the contributions of the social sciences

    Open Access•Sarah Ryan, Chris Hebdon et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2014

  • Walk this way, talk this way

    Open Access•John Ray•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2018

  • Performance Policies and Workforce Development

    Open Access•Barbara Patrick•Politics & Policy•2016

  • Fiscal Federalism, Performance Policies, and E ducation R eforms

    Open Access•Barbara Patrick•Politics & Policy•2012

  • Government Effectiveness in Comparative Perspective

    Soo-Young Lee, Andrew B Whitford•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2009

  • Nonprofits, Funders, and Evaluation

    Open Access•Joanne G Carman•The American Review of Public…•2008

  • Theory Building, Administrative Reform Movements, and the Perdurability of Herbert Hoover

    Open Access•Robert F Durant•The American Review of Public…•2009

  • Not Quite the Triumph They Describe

    Open Access•Dennis R Cyr, Gerald Swanson et al.•Public Administration Review•2007

  • Safeguarding Merit

    Open Access•Colt Jensen, Jaclyn Piatak•Public Administration Review•2026

  • Bridging Levels of Public Administration

    Open Access•Alasdair Roberts•Administration & Society•2020

  • Global Crises, American Public Administration, and the “New Interventionism” Revisited

    Open Access•Robert F Durant•Administration & Society•2011

  • Sarbanes‐Oxley and the Relentless Pursuit of Government Accountability

    Open Access•Michelle C Pautz, C Patrick Washington•Administration & Society•2009

  • Stealth Economy? Economic Theory and the Politics of Administrative Reform

    Open Access•J Pierre•Administration & Society•2011

  • Trust in Administration

    Open Access•Enamul Choudhury•Administration & Society•2008

  • Federalist No. 27

    Open Access•Stephanie P Newbold•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Salvaged from the Wreckage

    Open Access•M Ernita Joaquin•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Rediscovering the Taproot

    Open Access•Patricia M Shields•Public Administration Review•2008

  • The Hollowing of American Public Administration

    Open Access•Robert F Durant, David H Rosenbloom•The American Review of Public…•2016

  • Why Do Agencies Work Together? The Determinants of Network Formation at the Subnational Level of Government in Thailand

    Weerasak Krueathep, Norma M Riccucci et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2010

  • Organizational Capital in Boundary-Spanning Collaborations

    Craig Boardman•Journal of Public Administration…•2012

  • Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis

    John C Calanni, John Calanni et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • Managerial Trustworthiness and Organizational Outcomes

    Yoon Jik Cho, Evan J Ringquist•Journal of Public Administration…•2011

  • The Political Economy of Service Organization Reform in China

    Y Tang, Simon Y Tang et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2009

  • Which Public Values are Most Important? Linking Political Ideology and Public Service Motivation to Public Values Preferences

    Open Access•Nathan Favero, Colt Jensen et al.•The American Review of Public…•2025

  • Tools of Control? Comparing Congressional and Presidential Performance Management Reforms

    Open Access•Alexander Kroll, Donald P Moynihan•Public Administration Review•2020

  • An Exploratory Study of Time Stress and Its Causes among Government Employees

    Open Access•Tobin Im•Public Administration Review•2008

  • Public values and sector service delivery preferences

    Open Access•Jaclyn Piatak, Colt Jensen•Public Administration Review•2024

  • Getting Dirty‐Minded

    Open Access•Robert F Durant•Public Administration Review•2009

  • Policy and Management

    Open Access•Jessica E Sowa, Jiahuan Lu•Policy Studies Journal•2017

  • Congress as manager

    Open Access•John D Marvel, Robert J Mcgrath•Journal of Public Policy•2016

  • Public Trust in Government Administrators

    David J Houston, Lauren Howard Harding•Public Integrity•2013

  • Building a New American State

    Open Access•Stephen Skowronek•Building a New American State•1982

  • Divided we govern

    David R Mayhew•Divided we govern•1991

  • Congress

    Robert S Ro, ROBERT S ROSS et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1977

  • The Reinvention Game

    John R Thompson, James R Thompson et al.•Public Administration Review•1996

  • Performance

    Open Access•Patricia Wallace Ingraham•Public Administration Review•2005

  • The Administrative Conference of the United States

    Open Access•Warner W Gardner•The Annals of the American…•1972

  • Traditional Organizational Principles and the Managerial Presidency

    Ronald C Moe•Public Administration Review•1990

  • Public Management Reform

    Open Access•Lois Recascino Wise•Public Administration Review•2002

  • Reform's Changing Role

    Peri E Arnold•Public Administration Review•1995

  • The "Reinventing Government" Exercise

    Ronald C Moe•Public Administration Review•1994

Obras citantes distintas39
Citações por ano2,05
Intervalo de citações2007 - 2026 (20)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 39
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae