The Low Principles of Jurisprudence”

Edmund Burke's impeachment of Warren Hastings for his conduct as governor-general in India represented the era's most serious internal challenge to British imperialism. But the impeachment's legal and institutional implications have been neglected. The central points of contention were the nature of impeachment in Britain and the nature of law in India. Burke insisted that impeachment must override the “low” and “mean” standards of the common law, yet he celebrated India for its dense judicial institutions. Hastings took the opposite position, demanding that the impeachment adhere strictly to the common law, yet defending his conduct in India by appeal to its political expediency, rather than its lawfulness. Each found himself in a “rhetorical contradiction,” alternately arguing in praise of, and in critique of, legal reasoning and procedures. While Hastings attempted to surmount the contradiction through the discourse of realism, Burke turned to the discourse of natural law—a language of lawfulness without legalism

Contradiction · Epistemology · Impeachment · Jurisprudence · Legalism (Western philosophy · Political science · Politics · Rhetorical question · Rule of law · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

• Words on Fire

  Open Access•Rob Goodman•Words on Fire•2021

  Incluir item

• The Scandal of Empire

  Nicholas B Dirks•Scandal of Empire•2006

  Incluir item

• The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe

  Open Access•Anthony Pagden•Languages of Political Theory in…•1987

  Incluir item

• Before the Deluge

  Michael Sonenscher•Before the Deluge•2009

  Incluir item

• Liberalism and Empire

  Uday Singh Mehta•Liberalism and Empire•1999

  Incluir item

• The Company-State

  Philip J Stern•The company-state•2011

  Incluir item

• The Correspondence of Edmund Burke

  Carl B Cone, Edmund Burke et al.•The William and Mary Quarterly•1959

  Incluir item

• The Correspondence of Edmund Burke

  Carl B Cone, John Woods et al.•The William and Mary Quarterly•1965

  Incluir item

• Empire and revolution

  H T Dickinson•Intellectual History Review•2016

  Incluir item

• Warren Hastings and the Younger Pitt

  Cuthbert Collin Davies•The English Historical Review•1955

  Incluir item

• Tamerlane's Career and Its Uses

  Beatrice Rorbes Manz•Journal of world history•2002

  Incluir item

• Rights and the Heart

  Open Access•Lauren Hall•The Review of Politics•2011

  Incluir item

• Responsibility and Ignorance

  Clarissa Rile Hayward•The Journal of Politics•2017

  Incluir item

• Puzzling Through Burke

  Open Access•Don Herzog•Political Theory•1991

  Incluir item

• Montesquieu’s Paradoxical Spirit of Moderation

  Open Access•Alex Haskins•Political Theory•2018

  Incluir item

• A Turn to Empire

  Jennifer Pitts•Turn to Empire•2005

  Incluir item

• Empire and Legal Universalisms in the Eighteenth Century

  J Pitts•The American Historical Review•2012

  Incluir item

• Liberalism and Empire

  Thomas R Metcalf, Thomas Metcalf•Journal of the History of Ideas•2014

  Incluir item

• Edmund Burke and Reason of State

  David Armitage•Journal of the History of Ideas•2000

  Incluir item

• Burke and the Nature of Politics

  Robert A Smith, Carl B Cone•The William and Mary Quarterly•1966

  Incluir item

• The Deliberative Sublime

  Open Access•Rob Goodman•American Political Science Review•2018

  Incluir item

• The Theater of the Civilized Self

  Siraj Ahmed•Representations•2002

  Incluir item