Cohesion Is Not Coherence

Dados Bibliográficos

ID10815947
AutoresPatricia L Carrell (autor correspondente)
Ano1982
Volume16
Fascículo4
Páginas479
Data de publicação1982-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoTESOL Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0039-8322 • E-ISSN: 1545-7249
EditoraJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3586466
OpenAlexW2093464183
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas59
Referências citadas9

The purpose of this paper is to criticize the concept of cohesion as a measure of the coherence of a text. The paper begins with a brief overview of Halliday and Hasan's (1976) cohesion concept as an index of textual coherence. Next, the paper criticizes the concept of cohesion as a measure of textual coherence in the light of schema-theoretical views of text processing (e.g. reading) as an interactive process between the text and the reader. This criticism, which is drawn from both theoretical and empirical work in schema theory, attempts to show that text-analytic procedures such as Halliday and Hasan's cohesion concept, which encourage the belief that coherence is located in the text and can be defined as a configuration of textual features, and which fail to take the contributions of the text's reader into account, are incapable of accounting for textual coherence. The paper concludes with a caution to second language (EFL/ESL) teachers and researchers not to expect cohesion theory to be the solution to EFL/ESL reading/writing coherence problems at the level of the text

Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Cohesion (chemistry) · Linguistics · Physics · Sociology · Statistics · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology