Comparing the Effects of Governmental and Local Family Intervention Projects on Social Work Practices in Norway
A Cluster-Randomised Study
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10895469 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ira Malmberg‐heimonen (0000-0002-7211-4125, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, autor correspondente), Anne Grete Tøge (0000-0001-9905-951X, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1475-1494 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-07-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa003 |
| OpenAlex | W3034800320 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 15 |
Increased child poverty in Europe has urged the need for poverty alleviating measures, such as family intervention projects. In this project, family coordinators follow-up low-income families on multiple areas. The cluster-randomised evaluation compares effects of governmental and local family intervention projects on social work practices in Norway. Of the twenty-nine participating Labour and Welfare offices, fifteen were randomised to the experimental condition and received the governmental model for comprehensive follow-up (HOLF) model, including manuals, schemes for follow-up work and supervision structures. The fourteen offices randomised to the control group developed local models for the follow-up. The data comprise baseline (n = 58) and eighteen-month follow-up questionnaires to family coordinators. Effects on goal-focused meetings, relational skills, empowering and comprehensive follow-up processes and the coordination of services were measured. After adjusting for the nested structure of the data in a two-level model, the findings demonstrate that family coordinators from experimental group offices achieved more goal-focused meetings (p < 0.001) and demonstrated more relational skills (p = 0.011), compared to family coordinators from control group offices. Results demonstrate that the HOLF model increased the quality of the follow-up when compared to locally developed family intervention projects. The findings are discussed in the context of social work with families in poverty
Cluster (spacecraft) · Cluster randomised controlled trial · Context (archaeology) · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Intervention (counseling) · Poverty · Work (physics) · Community Health and Development · Engineering · Homelessness and Social Issues · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work
Intention-to-treat concept
Responding to the Troubled Families Programme
What Kind of Trouble? Meeting the Health Needs of ‘Troubled Families’ through Intensive Family Support
Intensive Family Intervention and the Problem Figuration of ‘Troubled Families’
Conceptualising the Contexts, Mechanisms and Outcomes of Intensive Family Intervention Projects
Improving follow-up with low-income families in Norway. What is new and what is already regular social work practice
Poverty and the political
Practising social work in a context of austerity
Social work, poverty, and child welfare interventions
Troubled Families’ Programme in England
Family Intervention Projects
Poverty-Aware Social Work
Poverty and Social Work
| Citações por ano | 0,8 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Altamente citado | Não |