Estimating the Effect of Nonignorable Nonresponse in Sample Surveys

Rubin (1977) developed a method for estimating, in a subjective sense, the effect of nonignorable nonresponse in sample surveys. Based on Bayesian techniques, this method produces a subjective probability interval for the statistic, such as the mean of a response variable, that would have been calculated if all nonrespondents had responded. Demographic and socioeconomic background information that is recorded for both respondents and nonrespondents plays an important role in sharpening the subjective interval - through the adjustment of a regression equation that uses this information. In this article, Rubin's method-sometimes called the mixture modeling approach to drawing inferences from self-selected samples-is reviewed and applied to real survey and experimental data on community standards for sexually explicit material in which respondents were asked to judge the material's appeal to prurient interest and patent offensiveness (two of the three legal criteria for a determination of obscenity). A critically important substantive issue in this context is whether or not the sample self-selection processes governing the willingness of individuals to participate in the experiment have so truncated the frequency distributions of participant judgments about obscenity that they are grossly biased and inaccurate. It is shown how the mixture modeling approach sheds light on the possible extent of such biases

Bayesian probability · Context (archaeology · Econometrics · Geography · Non-response bias · Sample (material · Statistic · Statistics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

• The Black-White Achievement Gap in the First College Year

  Open Access•Kenneth I Spenner, Claudia Buchmann et al.•Research in Social Stratification…•2004

  Incluir item

• Welfare reform and changes in the economic well-being of children

  Open Access•Neil G Bennett, Hsien-Hen Lu et al.•Population Research and Policy…•2004

  Incluir item

• Inference and missing data

  Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1976

  Incluir item

• Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error

  James J Heckman•Econometrica•1979

  Incluir item

• The Relationship between Modified and Usual Multiple-Regression Approaches to the Analysis of Dichotomous Variables

  Leo A Goodman•Sociological Methodology•1976

  Incluir item

• What Do We Really Know about Wages? The Importance of Nonreporting and Census Imputation

  Lee Lillard, Lee A Lillard et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1986

  Incluir item

• Nonresponse Bias for Attitude Questions

  Arthur L Stinchcombe, Calvin Jones et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1981

  Incluir item

• Estimating Community Standars

  Daniel Linz, Edward Donnerstein et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1991

  Incluir item

• An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data

  Richard A Berk•American Sociological Review•1983

  Incluir item

• Theory Testing in a World of Constrained Research Design

  Open Access•Ross M Stolzenberg, Daniel A Relles•Sociological Methods & Research•1990

  Incluir item

• Form effect in the measurement of feeling states

  Open Access•Rae R Newton, David Prensky et al.•Social Science Research•1982

  Incluir item