Communicating Assistance to Ukrainian Refugees
Does Empathetic Communication Make a Difference
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11048987 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Zuzana Ringlerova (0000-0002-5594-2172, Masaryk University, autor correspondente), Jan Kotýnek Krotký (0000-0002-0252-5180, Masaryk University) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Páginas | 1-17 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-01-10 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Nationalities Papers (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0090-5992 • E-ISSN: 1465-3923 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/nps.2024.59 |
| OpenAlex | W4406251344 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 39 |
European countries have been important supporters of Ukraine since the 2022 invasion by Russia. Responding to the invasion, however, was not the only challenge facing these countries in 2022. A tough domestic economic situation caused by high inflation and skyrocketing energy prices gave rise to public resentment accusing governments of favoring Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees over their own citizens. Yet, communicating governments’ policies on Ukraine efficiently and having the public on board matters because lack of public support may endanger the countries’ ability to help Ukraine in the war. Given the importance of political communication, we use the case of Czechia to explore the role of empathy in political communication between Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees. We build on existing studies which suggest that empathy in communication has the potential to decrease polarization of public opinion and that candidates using empathetic communication are viewed more positively. First, in a rhetorical analysis, we demonstrate that empathy with citizens’ concerns is not a part of the government’s defense of its refugee policy. Then, in an original survey experiment, we show that contrary to expectations, expressing empathy with citizens’ concerns does not significantly increase public support for help to refugees
Linguistics · Political science · Refugee · Sociology · Ukrainian · International Student and Expatriate Challenges · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Psychology
Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding
Empathy
Political Life
The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare
Equivalence Tests
Immigration and Perceptions of National Political Systems in Europe
Bloody Revenge
The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies
I feel your pain”
Rethinking the Public Sphere in an Age of Radical-Right Populism
This Country Is Not for Anyone”
Rhetoric and the Invention of Double Entry Bookkeeping
The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication
Empathic
The European refugee crisis and public support for the externalisation of migration management
Politicians Don’t Understand People Like Me
Radical-Left Populism during the Great Recession
Can political speech foster tolerance of immigrants
Who Cares? Explaining Perceptions of Compassion in Candidates for Office
Information Equivalence in Survey Experiments
Becoming part of the gang? Established and nonestablished populist parties and the role of external efficacy
Making Sense of Stories
Why Some Anti-Immigrant Parties Fail and Others Succeed
A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support
Rhetoric of Motives
Wir schaffen das
A rhetorical discourse analysis of online anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic jokes
Emotional Reactions to and Support for Immigrant Policies
| Citações por ano | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Altamente citado | Não |