Social judgement of L2 accented speech stereotyping and its influential factors
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11182000 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Okim Kang (0000-0002-7721-5283, Northern Arizona University, autor correspondente), Katherine Yaw (0000-0002-4382-9762, Northern Arizona University) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 921-936 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-04-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0143-4632 • E-ISSN: 1747-7557 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01434632.2021.1931247 |
| OpenAlex | W3165372008 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 14 |
| Referências citadas | 57 |
If extraneous information leads listeners to biased judgements, then their speech perceptions are likely to manifest distortion in that direction. This phenomenon is known as reverse linguistic stereotyping (RLS), which has been confirmed by 25 years of empirical study. Recent research on effects of listener background on ratings of speaker pronunciation and social judgments are likewise consistent with the concept of reverse linguistic stereotyping. In particular, one way of operationalising listener aberration is measuring a function of listener backgrounds and proclivity toward RLS along with a dimension of speaker social attractiveness, superiority, and dynamism. The current study examined to what extent listeners’ background characteristics and RLS propensity factors affect their social judgements of second language (L2) accented speech. The background factors included learners’ accent exposure, study abroad experience, the degree of foreign language study experience, and three RLS dimensions. Results suggest that listeners who hold negatively stereotyped expectations about LX accents tend to find accented speech less superior and less socially attractive. Findings offer implications to language education and various workforce-related communication in global contexts
Affect (linguistics · Attractiveness · Cognitive psychology · Dynamism · Intonation (linguistics · Judgement · Linguistics · Perception · Pronunciation · Stress (linguistics · Communication · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Multilingual Education and Policy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Social Psychology
Revisiting US Undergraduate Perceptions of Non-native English Varieties
Gender and accent stereotypes in communication with an intelligent virtual assistant
Affect as a component of second language speech perception
Filipino non-native English-speaking teachers and the contradictions in their own backyard
Racializing Accents
Accent Awareness of World Englishes
Processing Fluency and Inferred Motive
Accent preferences in child L2 learners
Linguistic and Non-linguistic Factors Affecting International Teaching Assistants’ Comprehensibility and Teaching Quality
Informal digital learning of English and perceptions of using EIL materials
Exploring linguistic stereotyping of international students at a Canadian university
I Want to Be Born with That Pronunciation
Individual differences in perception of prosody in Mandarin-accented speech are linked to pitch perception, melody memory, musical training, and neural encoding of sound
Visual Cues to Speakers' Religious Affiliation and Listeners' Understanding of Second Language French Speech
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
Radical Constructivism
Perceptual learning in speech
Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates' judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants
The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit
Talker-specific learning in speech perception
The Mutual Intelligibility of L2 Speech
A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models
English with an Accent
Teaching First Language Speakers to Communicate Across Linguistic Difference
From One to Multiple Accents on a Test of L2 Listening Comprehension
Why the Dichotomy ‘L1 Versus LX User’ is Better than ‘Native Versus Non-native Speaker
The effect of training and rater differences on oral proficiency assessment
An investigation into native and non-native teachers' judgments of oral English performance
Judgments of oral proficiency by non-native and native English speaking teacher raters
Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews
The effect of rater variables in the development of an occupation-specific language performance test
Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance
A portrait of the young in the new multilingual Spain
Social dominance orientation, nonnative accents, and hiring recommendations
Who speaks “broken English”? US undergraduates’ perceptions of non‐native English 1
The fluency principle
The effects of accent familiarity and language teaching experience on raters' judgments of non-native speech
Cultural and linguistic miscues
Are greek letter social organizations a factor in Undergraduates perceptions of international instructors
A meta‐analysis of the effects of speakers' accents on interpersonal evaluations
Professors' Reactions to the Academic Writing of Nonnative-Speaking Students
Mitigating U.S. Undergraduates’ Attitudes Toward International Teaching Assistants
The Effects of International Accents and Shared First Language on Listening Comprehension Tests
Native and Nonnative Judgments of Intelligibility and Irritation
Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of U.S. English
Reliably Biased
The Effect of Familiarity on the Comprehensibility of Nonnative Speech
Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners
Evaluational reactions to spoken languages
Listening with an attitude
Accents of Guilt
Measuring Language Attitudes
Speaking With a Nonnative Accent
Reverse Linguistic Stereotyping
The Reference Frame Effect
| Obras citantes distintas | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 14 |