Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Barriers and Enablers to Safeguarding Children and Adults within a Disability Services Context

Insights from an Australian Delphi Study

Dados Bibliográficos

ID11196751
AutoresGoetz Ottmann (0000-0002-3568-2166, Goetz Ottmann Associates Melbourne Australia, autor correspondente), Keith Mcvilly (0000-0002-9753-9031, School of Social and Political Sciences University of Melbourne Australia, autor correspondente), Julie Anderson (0000-0003-4136-9229, School of Psychology Deakin University Australia Victoria Australia, autor correspondente), Jessica Chapman (School of Psychology Deakin University Australia Victoria Australia), Imalka Karlyawasam (School of Psychology Deakin University Australia Victoria Australia), Alana Roy (0000-0001-5776-5280, School of Psychology Deakin University Australia Victoria Australia, autor correspondente), Nahila Satari (School of Psychology Deakin University Australia Victoria Australia), Adam Stefano (School of Psychology Deakin University Australia Victoria Australia)
Ano2017
Volume51
Fascículo3
Páginas488-510
Data de publicação2017-05-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSocial Policy and Administration (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/spol.12189
OpenAlexW2222007061
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas31

Research conducted in the 1990s revealed the tragic irony that exposure to the disability support system, and particularly to its institutional forms, was a major risk factor related to the neglect and abuse of children and adults with a disability. Subsequently, a range of policies have been introduced to minimize risk. However, recurring events of abuse and neglect in the disability services sector in high and middle income countries demonstrate that processes geared to safeguard children and adults with a disability from abuse and neglect remain insufficient. To establish the wider fabric of organizational factors that contribute to effective safeguarding practices within the Australian disability support sector, a modified online Delphi study was conducted, capturing the views of disability services staff and managers (n = 249) regarding barriers and enablers to effective safeguarding. This study identified issues concerning organizational culture, management practice, workforce development, client capacity building and contextual factors. During Round Two of the Delphi, participants were asked to rate the categorized enabler statements according to importance on a 10‐point Likert scale, to ascertain the degree of consensus. A total of 262 of the statements were regarded as important or very important. The Delphi result highlighted the considerable gap between the wider systemic and cultural processes that, in the eyes of disability services staff and management, contribute to good safeguarding practice and the safeguarding measures currently in place. The article calls for a holistic approach to safeguarding that addresses procedural issues and to the transformation of the wider systemic and cultural fabric of an organization

Business · Context (archaeology · Delphi method · Geography · Neglect · Political science · Public relations · Safeguarding · Workforce · Child Abuse and Trauma · Elder Abuse and Neglect · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • A picture is worth a thousand words

    Open Access•Briana C Prager, Sherri Broder et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • I walk from trouble’

    Goetz Ottmann, Keith Mcvilly et al.•Disability & Society•2016

  • Safeguarding in Australia’s new disability markets

    Open Access•Natasha Cortis, Georgia Van Toorn•Critical Social Policy•2022

  • Maltreatment and disabilities

    Open Access•Patricia M Sullivan, John F Knutson•Child Abuse & Neglect•2000

  • Delphi

    Open Access•Mark J Clayton•Educational Psychology•1997

  • ‘A Fit Person to be Removed’

    A R A Stevens•Disability Handicap & Society•1991

  • Protecting people with learning disabilities from abuse

    Open Access•Rachel Davies, Robert Jenkins•The Journal of Adult Protection•2004

  • Helping vulnerable adults to keep safe

    Open Access•Mick Collins, Mel Walford•The Journal of Adult Protection•2008

  • Involvement of service users in adult safeguarding

    Open Access•Janet Wallcraft•The Journal of Adult Protection•2012

  • The understanding that care staff bring to abuse

    Fiona Parley•The Journal of Adult Protection•2010

  • The experience of being protected

    Open Access•Fiona Sherwood‐johnson, B Cro et al.•The Journal of Adult Protection•2013

  • Adult protection and effective action in tackling violence and hostility against disabled people

    Open Access•Chih Hoong Sin, Annie Hedges et al.•The Journal of Adult Protection•2011

  • A lad tried to get hold of my boobs, so I kicked him’

    Andrea Hollomotz•Disability & Society•2011

  • I walk from trouble’

    Goetz Ottmann, Keith Mcvilly et al.•Disability & Society•2016

  • Policies Don't Protect People, It's How They Are Implemented’

    Open Access•Ruth Northway, Rachel Davies et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2007

  • Consensus methods

    Alexander Fink, Jacqueline Kosecoff et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1984

  • Managers' and Staff Experiences of Adult Protection Allegations in Mental Health and Learning Disability Residential Services

    P Rees, P J Rees et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2010

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,3
Intervalo de citações2016 - 2022 (7)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae