The ‘Dole or Drudgery’ Dilemma
Education, the Work Ethic and Unemployment
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11197196 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Andrew Dunn (0000-0002-8261-6153, University of Lincoln, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2010 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 1-19 |
| Data de publicação | 2010-02-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Policy and Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00697.x |
| OpenAlex | W1986847765 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 12 |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
Before the recession, Labour ministers claimed that much unemployment in the UK was voluntary. While social policy authors have repeatedly countered such claims by stressing that unemployed people generally possess a strong work ethic and employment commitment, their accounts typically neglect the role that choosiness in job search behaviour plays in deciding individuals' employment status. Fifty in‐depth interviews with both unemployed and employed respondents exposed considerable diversity in attitudes towards ‘dole’ (being unemployed and claiming unemployment benefits) and ‘drudgery’ (doing less attractive jobs). The more educated were more likely to prefer ‘dole’ to ‘drudgery’ (this was also found using National Child Development Study survey data), yet they usually found jobs despite their greater choosiness. Those with very low educational attainment often desperately wanted jobs but could not find them due to their low employability – which might offer an explanation for the often replicated (yet paradoxical) finding that unemployed people generally exhibit a strong work ethic and pro‐employment attitudes and behaviours. Furthermore, the findings indicate that the scope for many Jobseeker's Allowance claimants to increase their net income by undertaking an unattractive job is greater than social policy authors often imply. The question of ‘who must do the least attractive jobs?’ has been neglected by both social policy academics and policy‐makers
Dilemma · Economic growth · Economics · Employability · Labour economics · Neglect · Social policy · Unemployment · Work (physics · Work ethic · Employment and Welfare Studies · Labor market dynamics and wage inequality · Psychology · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Le chômage en fin de carrière comme mécanisme d’exclusion
Doing Excellent Social Research with Documents
Reading active labour market policy politically
Incomes after Job‐loss in the United States
Supporting Disadvantaged Young People into Work
Benefit ‘Myths’? The Accuracy and Inaccuracy of Public Beliefs about the Benefits System
A Capability Approach to Unemployed Young People's Voice and Agency in the Development and Implementation of Employment Activation Policies
Unemployment and attitudes to work
A Capability Approach to Understand the Scarring Effects of Unemployment and Job Insecurity
Activation Workers' Perceptions of Their Long-term Unemployed Clients' Attitudes towards Employment
Active Labour Market Policies and Social Integration in Germany
Fit for Purpose? Welfare Reform and Challenges for Health and Labour Market Policy in the UK
Social insurance and allied services
Unemployment
British Social Attitudes
Welfare or Welfare State?
Welfare rights and responsibilities
Government Matters
Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities
Disconnected Youth
Redundant Masculinities
Modernization and Postmodernization
Youth unemployment
Unemployment
Comparing the Protestant work ethic in the employed and unemployed in Australia
The “Employment‐first” Welfare State
The Concept of Employability
Young People, Job Search and Local Labour Markets
Trapped in Poverty? Labour-market decisions in Low-Income Households
Avoiding the 'McJobs
A Divided Working Class? Planning and Career Perception in the Service and Working Classes
Agency, Modernity and Social Policy
| Citações por ano | 0,8 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2011 - 2020 (10) |
| Altamente citado | Não |