Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Justifications for not sanctioning welfare clients

Social workers' implementation of the “wastage of resources” sanctioning directive in Poland

Dados Bibliográficos

ID11198483
AutoresMateusz Trochymiak (0000-0002-4880-0977, Faculty of Sociology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland, autor correspondente)
Ano2022
Volume56
Fascículo7
Páginas1041-1055
Data de publicação2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSocial Policy and Administration (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/spol.12831
OpenAlexW4283205452
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas43

Sanctioning welfare clients has become a fundamental practice for social policy based on behavioural conditionality. Although sanctioning practices have received attention in research focused on street‐level work, the way in which sanctioning practices are structured in an institutional context and used by caseworkers should be explored further. This study examines the implementation of the “wastage of resources” sanctioning directive in Polish social welfare offices, based on interviews with social workers and case studies conducted between 2019 and 2021. A research framework based on the street‐level work concept was used to indicate that sanctions were rarely used by social workers because of the administrative justification process, which overwhelmed them with the responsibility of proving sanction‐worthy circumstances. Catalogues of sanction‐worthy situations are developed by local‐level policy agents, social workers, welfare office managers, municipal courts and clients. However, generally, social workers adapt to the given context by disciplining clients informally and avoiding formal sanctions

Business · Conditionality · Context (archaeology · Directive · Economics · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public relations · Sanctions · Social Welfare · Welfare · Work (physics · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work

  • The Age-Negotiated Configuration of Welfare Conditionality

    Open Access•Tat Chor Au‐yeung, TAT CHOR AU-YEUNG et al.•Social Policy and Society•2026

  • Benefits Conditionality in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Ben Baumberg Geiger, Lisa Scullion et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2025

  • Practising Participation at the Street Level

    Open Access•Nicoline Annetorp Roth•Social Policy and Administration•2025

  • Discretion and Street-Level Practice

    Open Access•Hendrik Wagenaar•Discretion and the Quest for…•2020

  • Conceptualizing Discretion

    Open Access•Tony Evans, Peter Hupe•Discretion and the Quest for…•2020

  • Discretion from a Legal Perspective

    Open Access•Peter Mascini•Discretion and the Quest for…•2020

  • It's Not Like I'm Poor

    Jennifer Sykes, JenniferVE Sykes et al.•It's Not Like I'm Poor•2019

  • Welfare Conditionality

    Beth Watts, Suzanne Fitzpatrick et al.•Welfare Conditionality•2018

  • Accountability in Street-Level Organizations

    Evelyn Z Brodkin•International Journal of Public…•2008

  • A Public Service Gap

    Peter Hupe, Aurélien Buffat•Public Management Review•2014

  • Transformation of the Welfare State

    Open Access•Neil Gilbert•Transformation of the Welfare State•2002

  • When the State Meets the Street

    Bernardo Zacka•When the State Meets the Street•2017

  • Work and the Welfare State

    Vicki Lens, Michael Adler et al.•Work and the Welfare State•2013

  • Discretion in the Welfare State

    Open Access•Evelyn Z Brodkin•Discretion and the Quest for…•2020

  • Professional Discretion and Accountability in the Welfare State

    Open Access•Anders Molander, Harald Grimen et al.•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2012

  • Cops, Teachers, Counselors

    Steven Maynard-Moody, Steven Maynard‐moody et al.•Cops, Teachers, Counselors•2003

  • Fair Conditions and Fair Consequences? Exploring New Labour, Welfare Contractualism and Social Attitudes

    Open Access•Daniel Sage•Social Policy and Society•2012

  • Welfare Reform, Jobcentre Plus and the Street-Level Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Del Roy Fletcher•Social Policy and Society•2011

  • Responses from the Frontline

    Open Access•Dorte Caswell, Matilde Høybye-Mortensen•European Journal of Social Security•2015

  • Activation in social work with social assistance claimants in four Swedish municipalities

    Jenny Nybom•European Journal of Social Work•2011

  • Is it because you can’t, or don’t want to? The implementation of frontline sanctions in Norwegian social assistance

    Open Access•Susana Vilhena•European Journal of Social Work•2020

  • Administrative justice, discretion and the ‘welfare to work’ project

    Roy Sainsbury•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2008

  • Security, equality and opportunity

    Open Access•Peter Taylor-Gooby•Journal of European Social Policy•2011

  • Insertion as an alternative to workfare

    Open Access•Lisa A Schulte, Lisa Schulte et al.•Journal of European Social Policy•2017

  • Performance Management Regimes in Practice

    Open Access•Jodi Sandfort, Sook Jin Ong et al.•The American Review of Public…•2018

  • Implementing Full and Partial Work Sanctions

    Open Access•Vicki Lens•The American Review of Public…•2008

  • Intensity, moderation, and the pressures of expectation

    Open Access•Jim Kaufman•Social Policy and Administration•2020

  • Making welfare conditional

    Open Access•Rik Van Berkel•Social Policy and Administration•2020

  • Support for All in the UK Work Programme? Differential Payments, Same Old Problem

    Open Access•James Rees, Adam Whitworth et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2014

  • Performance Management, Caseloads and the Frontline Provision of Social Services

    Open Access•Rik Van Berkel, Eva Knies•Social Policy and Administration•2016

  • Frontline managers' perceptions and justifications of behavioural conditionality

    Open Access•Talieh Sadeghi, Lars Inge Terum•Social Policy and Administration•2020

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion

    Tony Evans•The British Journal of Social Work•2004

  • The Quest for Responsibility

    Stuart C Gilman, STUART GILMAN•Administrative Theory & Praxis•1999

  • Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public

    Wim Van Oorschot•Policy & Politics•2000

  • Which Clients are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test

    Sebastian Jilke, Lidewij Tummers et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2018

  • Punishment on the Frontlines of Public Service Delivery

    Open Access•Mogens Jin Pedersen, Justin M Stritch et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2018

  • The Organization of Discipline

    Joe So, J SOSS et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2011

  • Policy Work

    Evelyn Z Brodkin•Journal of Public Administration…•2011

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability

    Open Access•Peter Hupe, Michael Hill•Public Administration•2007

  • Welfare-to-work, Agency and Personal Responsibility

    Open Access•Sharon Wright•Journal of Social Policy•2012

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano3
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae