Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Rhetoric of Decision Science, or Herbert A. Simon Says

Dados Bibliográficos

ID11261524
AutoresChristina R Miller (0000-0001-6597-1818, North Carolina State University, autor correspondente), Carolyn R Miller (North Carolina State University)
Ano1989
Volume14
Fascículo1
Páginas43-46
Data de publicação1989-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
EditoraSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/016224398901400104
OpenAlexW1969539819
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas1

Rhetoric, Aristotle tells us, has to do with things about which we deliberate but for which we have no systematic rules. In more contemporary language, concerns uncertainty. Over the centuries, we have become less certain than Aristotle was about many things, and what we call the new rhetoric reflects the extension of uncertainty to matters other than Athenian civic affairs-beyond ethics and politics to philosophy, the academic disciplines in general. What is central to both the old, Aristotelian and this new, extended is the function of deliberation, which is made possible and useful by uncertainty; offers a theory of choice in human affairs. As the domain of has been extended, though, so has the influence of social which has developed an analogue to in science, a theory of choice with sources in economic theory. Decision science formalizes the elements of complex decision problems so that a set of logical axioms can be used to analyze and compare alternatives, one of which will, it is presumed, emerge as a correct, even obvious, choice. The analysis yields a quantified function, which represents the expected utility of each alternative; the quantities for a set of alternatives can be used to rank a decision maker's preferences for the alternatives. In various forms, these methods are widely used and accepted in industrial and governmental decision making such as operations research, cost-benefit analysis, risk assessment, and the like. Comparing these two approaches to choice under uncertainty, that of traditional deliberative and that of decision should help

Axiom · Decision analysis · Decision theory · Deliberation · Economics · Epistemology · Function (biology · Law and economics · Management science · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Rank (graph theory · Rhetoric · Set (abstract data type · Social choice theory · Sociology · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy

  • Being 'rational' and being 'human

    Open Access•Jill Russell, Trisha Greenhalgh•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2014

  • Negotiating expert status

    Open Access•Will Rifkin, W D Rifkin et al.•IEEE Technology and Society…•1997

  • The Ecology of Emergency Management Work in the Digital Age

    Open Access•Shalini Misra, Patrick S Roberts et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2020

  • The role of pathos in the decision‐making process

    Craig Waddell•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1990

  • Reason in Human Affairs

    Herbert A Simon•The American Journal of Psychology•1984

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano0,11
Intervalo de citações1990 - 2020 (31)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae