Ends and means in the settlement of international disputes over jurisdiction

This paper offers an analysis of some of the problems arising in those international disputes concerning issues of public international law which do not present any proximate threat to international peace or security. It does so in the context of an examination of procedures for settling disputes over jurisdiction in public international law, disputes of the kind which arose in 1982 when the United States’ right to control—that is, its jurisdiction over—exports from Western Europe to the Soviet Union was challenged by the EEC and its member states. The analysis is also intended to have general relevance to all international legal disputes in which individuals are directly involved as disputants with or alongside states

Business · Context (archaeology · Geography · International law · Jurisdiction · Political science · Public international law · Relevance (law · Settlement (finance · Universal jurisdiction · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law

• Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations

  Open Access•Andrew Linklater•Men and Citizens in the Theory of…•1982

  Incluir item

• Taking Rights Seriously

  Alan Mabe•Social Theory and Practice•1977

  Incluir item

• Do general rules of international law exist

  Open Access•A V Lowe•Review of International Studies•1983

  Incluir item

• The Identification and Appraisal of Diverse Systems of Public Order

  Open Access•Myres S Mcdougal, Harold D Lasswell•American Journal of International…•1959

  Incluir item