Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land use preferences in Norway
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11465713 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Vera H Hausner (0000-0001-9825-0419, UiT The Arctic University of Norway), Greg Brown (0000-0003-3283-4619, The University of Queensland, autor correspondente), Eiliv Lægreid (UiT The Arctic University of Norway) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Páginas | 446-461 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-12-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Land Use Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.018 |
| OpenAlex | W1209234837 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 34 |
| Referências citadas | 49 |
Agriculture · Commons · Distribution (mathematics · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental resource management · Game reserve · Geography · Land tenure · Land use · Recreation · Wildlife · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology
A Review of Sampling Effects and Response Bias in Internet Participatory Mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI)
Using crowdsourced spatial data from Flickr vs. PPGIS for understanding nature's contribution to people in Southern Norway
Rich local knowledge despite high transience in an Arctic community experiencing rapid environmental change
Narrativas de académicos y representantes gubernamentales sobre las poblaciones “irregulares” en zonas de conservación en el sur de México
Rethinking tourism conflict potential within and between groups using participatory mapping
Assessing the diversity and evenness of ecosystem services as perceived by residents using participatory mapping
Honouring the participatory mapping contributions and enduring legacy of Professor Gregory G. Brown
Linking coastal cultural ecosystem services to human well-being and leisure preferences
Participatory mapping reveals biocultural and nature values in the shared landscape of a Nordic Unesco Biosphere Reserve
Joint social‐ecological outcomes of private land conservation
Coordinated action across administration levels and assessments
Integrating Land Use and Community Perspectives for Sustainable Agriculture in Rural India, Dewgain
Understanding and mapping local conflicts related to protected areas in small islands
Intersections of ecosystem services and common-pool resources literature
Assessing linkages between ecosystem services, land-use and well-being in an agroforestry landscape using public participation GIS
Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes
Identifying Environmental and Natural Resource Management Conflict Potential Using Participatory Mapping
Gender Equality in Conservation Management
Linking Tourism and Conservation on Privately Owned Natural Areas
Assessing multiple approaches for modelling land-use conflict potential from participatory mapping data
Strengthening the effectiveness of nature reserves in representing ecosystem services
Effects of land fragmentation on the governance of the commons
Governance of interdependent ecosystem services and common-pool resources
Local support among arctic residents to a land tenure reform in Finnmark, Norway
Cultural ecosystem services provision in response to urbanization in Cameroon
How to prioritize protected areas
Wildfire, protected areas and forest ownership
Worldwide research trends on land tenure
The relationship between people's activities and values with the protection level and biodiversity
Identifying spatial overlap in the values of locals, domestic- and international tourists to protected areas
Explaining landscape preference heterogeneity using machine learning-based survey analysis
Nature-based winter sports and their ephemeral tracks
Balancing landscape values and tourism choices
Visitors' place-based evaluations of unacceptable tourism impacts in Oulanka National Park, Finland
Balancing on an Alp
Why landscapes of the past are important for the future
Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes
Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping
Effectiveness of Strict vs. Multiple Use Protected Areas in Reducing Tropical Forest Fires
Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services
Governance regime and location influence avoided deforestation success of protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon
Going beyond panaceas
Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply
Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS)
Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets
Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments – Mapping indicators for landscape services
A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services
Science for managing ecosystem services
The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis
A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services
The Ipbes Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people
Landscape protection as a tool for managing agricultural landscapes in Norway
Does secure land tenure save forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation
Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions
Mapping Spatial Attributes in Survey Research for Natural Resource Management
Agriculture as an upholder of cultural heritage? Conceptualizations and value judgements—A Norwegian perspective in international context
Complex Tenure and Deforestation
Tenancy in Norwegian agriculture
Vegetation change and land tenure in Mexico
Common property protected areas
The living commons of West Tyrol, Austria
Social Landscape Metrics
A case of conflicts in conservation
| Citações por ano | 3,4 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Altamente citado | Não |