Are phonosyntactic rules necessary

Dados Bibliográficos

ID11474255
AutoresArnold M Zwicky (University of Toronto), Ellen M Kaisse (0009-0008-1858-7694, University of Toronto), Elizabeth A Cowper, Elizabeth Cowper (0000-0002-1335-4321, University of Toronto), Keren D Rice, Keren Rice (University of Toronto)
Ano1987
Volume4
Fascículo1
Páginas185-194
Data de publicação1987-05-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPhonology Yearbook (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0265-8062 • E-ISSN: 2059-6286
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0952675700000816
OpenAlexW2156235490
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas8
Referências citadas2

Selkirk (1986) proposes that rules of the phrasal phonology apply to a structure called P-structure that is derived from, but not isomorphic to, syntactic structure. While Selkirk claims that most rules of external sandhi fall into the category of P-structure rules, there are three rules that she suggests may still require direct reference to syntactic structure. These are Mende Consonant Mutation (Conteh et al. 1986), Kimatuumbi Vowel Shortening (Odden this volume), and ‘perhaps even rules like English wanna contraction’ (Selkirk 1986: 374). Selkirk says that these rules ‘appear to be sensitive to a richer array of syntactic conditions than would be expressible via the translation of syntax into P-structure’

Consonant · Linguistics · Phonological rule · Phonology · Syntactic structure · Syntax · Vowel · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation