Who pays for measles? The economic arguments for sustained immunization

Increasing international commitment to Universal Child Immunization (UCI) intensifies pressures on already scarce health resources. The costs of the 1989/90 measles epidemic were measured in the State of Guerrero, Mexico, from the perspective of the health services and 43 representative communities. Financial loss was incurred from illness in families of 70% of the 1211 measles cases in a study population of 50294. Some 30% of these families did not have sufficient cash reserves and sold labour, farm animals or other assets. Among those families, 20% took loans in order to pay the health care costs of their children's measles, 19% sold grain stores and 4% indentured their future labour. Standardizing household expenditure on local labour costs, it was possible to quantify out-of-pocket expenditure and loss of work time. The average cost of a measles case to the community amounted to the local equivalent of 18.8 work days of an unskilled labourer, with 27 work days per household affected, excluding income foregone due to early deaths. Hastings and colleagues calculated the average cost of measles to British families in 1985 to be UK£11.09, considerably less than a day's wage for a British unskilled labourer at that time. Applying the costs in the 43 communities to the whole State of Guerrero, without placing a cash value on some 4000 children aged under five who died from measles, the epidemic cost the community the equivalent of 1.6 million work days. The health services spent 10% of this value on the epidemic. The cost of vaccinating all children in the State could be sustained for five years, and increase by 10% per year, and it would still be lower than the economic cost of an epidemic to the communities.

Immunization · Library science · noma · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Computer Science · Global Maternal and Child Health · Immune responses and vaccinations · Law · Medicine · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

• Household cost-benefit equations and sustainable universal childhood immunisation

  Open Access•Neil Andersson, Anne Cockcroft et al.•BMC Public Health•2005

  Incluir item

• Camino Verde (The Green Way)

  Open Access•Neil Andersson, Jorge Arosteguí et al.•BMC Public Health•2017

  Incluir item

• Equity and vaccine uptake

  Open Access•Steven Mitchell, Neil Andersson et al.•BMC International Health and…•2009

  Incluir item

• Evidence-based discussion increases childhood vaccination uptake

  Open Access•Neil Andersson, Anne Cockcroft et al.•BMC International Health and…•2009

  Incluir item

• One size does not fit all

  Open Access•Anne Cockcroft, Neil Andersson et al.•BMC International Health and…•2009

  Incluir item

• Building international public health vision through local community research

  R J Ledogar, L G Acosta et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1999

  Incluir item

• Pandémie de rougeole, 1988-1992

  Laurence Monnais•Anthropologie et Sociétés•2023

  Incluir item

• Gender and evidence-based planning

  Neil Andersson, Melissa Roche•Development in Practice•2006

  Incluir item

• Vaccinations in the third world

  Open Access•M Nichter•Social Science & Medicine•1995

  Incluir item

• Estimating the cost of illness

  Dorothy P Rice•American Journal of Public Health…•1967

  Incluir item

• The use of community-based data in health planning in Mexico and Central America

  Open Access•Neil Andersson, EDUARDO MARTINEZ et al.•Health Policy and Planning•1989

  Incluir item

• The economic value of life

  J Steven Landefeld, Eugene P Seskin•American Journal of Public Health•1982

  Incluir item

• Benefits, risks and costs of immunization for measles, mumps and rubella

  C C White, Craigc White et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1985

  Incluir item

• Cost-effectiveness of the expanded programme of immunization in the Ivory Coast

  Open Access•Donald S Shepard, Layes Sanoh et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1986

  Incluir item