A Self‐Report Survey
Australian Clinicians’ Attitudes Towards Progress Monitoring Measures
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11510356 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jennifer Chung (0000-0003-0770-2884, Monash University, autor correspondente), Ben Buchanan (0000-0002-2456-7795, Monash University) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 3-12 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-07-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Australian Psychologist (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0005-0067 • E-ISSN: 1742-9544 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ap.12352 |
| OpenAlex | W2872890243 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 37 |
ObjectiveResearch supports an association between regularly administering standardised measures to assess client progress (progress monitoring) and improved treatment outcomes. However, some research suggests clinicians often rely heavily and solely on clinical judgement when making treatment decisions. This study was the first to explore psychologists’ implementation of progress monitoring, within an Australian clinical context.MethodA self‐report survey investigated Australian psychologists’ (N = 208; gender and age proportional to national representation) attitude, awareness, use, motives, and barriers towards implementing standardised assessment and progress monitoring. The survey comprised of the Attitudes towards Standardised Assessment Scales, and existing literature on progress monitoring implementation.ResultsNinety‐eight per cent of psychologists were aware of progress monitoring measures, and 69% reported using them in practice. Majority of progress monitoring users rated these measures as very useful (51%) and over one third (39%) used them with most of their clients. Contrary to the hypothesis, a t‐test demonstrated that attitude towards standardised assessment did not differ between progress monitoring users and non‐users. Among the clinicians who have not implemented progress monitoring, time barriers were rated as most important.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that although awareness of progress monitoring may be widely known, perceived barriers may outweigh the potential benefits for some. It is also concluded that further qualitative research is needed to adequately understand these barriers and their importance. Future interventions may then promote evidence‐based recommendations and focus on the practicality, utility, and workflow difficulties associated with incorporating progress monitoring
Context (archaeology · Judgement · Monitoring and evaluation · Political science · Psychological intervention · Self-monitoring · Applied Psychology · Medicine · Nursing · Psychiatric care and mental health services · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Schizophrenia research and treatment · Social Psychology
Evidence-based practice in psychology.
Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework
The Theory of Planned Behavior
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour
The theory of planned behavior
An Investigation of Self-Assessment Bias in Mental Health Providers
Using information about patient progress in supervision
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |