Examining the Evolution of the Field of Public Administration through a Bibliometric Analysis of Public Administration Review
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11587271 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Chaoqun Ni (0000-0002-4130-7602, Simmons University), Cassidy R Sugimoto (0000-0001-8608-3203, Indiana University Bloomington), Alice Robbins (0000-0002-2020-9149, Indiana University Bloomington), Alice Robbin (Indiana University Bloomington) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 77 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 496-509 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-03-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Public Administration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/puar.12737 |
| OpenAlex | W2602400993 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 32 |
| Referências citadas | 64 |
In 2015, Public Administration Review celebrated its 75th year of publication. For this milestone, the PAR Editorial Board selected the 75 most influential articles in the history of the journal and invited scholars to “revisit a selection of these articles” in order “to take stock of what these articles meant for the field.” Bibliometrics offers a complementary view of the history of a discipline and the evolution of its research and practice agendas through an analysis of its published literature. This article examines the changes over time in PAR from 1940 through 2013 in authorship: contributions, impact, gender composition, institutional and national affiliation, profession as scholar or practitioner, collaboration networks, and the status of the 75 influential articles. Through an extensive quantitative analysis of scholarly production, this article demonstrates PAR’ s centrality to the discipline of public administration and its bridging role between public administration and political science
Administration (probate law · Bibliometrics · Centrality · Field (mathematics · Library science · Milestone · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · E-Government and Public Services · History · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
Characteristics and changes in Japanese public administration research
Bibliometric analysis and visualization of state administrative law in Scopus database from 2017–2021
Research trends in healthcare and hospital administration in Japan
Rekreasyon Bilim Dalının Geçmişten Günümüze Bibliyometrik Analizi
Research on Public Service Motivation and Leadership
A social network analysis of academic journals in public administration in the early twenty-first century
Using ego-network analyses to examine journal citations
Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Papers Citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”
Searching for dialogue in public sector budgeting research
Has democratic governance and the rule of law been compromised by the continued growth of the administrative state
From Disciplinary Depth to Interdisciplinary Breadth
Reimagining race and gender in public administration and public policy
The Slippery Slope
A century of Public Administration
Global scientific production, international cooperation, and knowledge evolution of public administration
The Aims of Public Administration
Policy impacts of public administration and policy research
Death, actually
A Century of Nonprofit Studies
E ‐Government Adoption in Ghana
Understanding and assessing the Chinese public administration discipline through data mining on public administration scholars and schools
Public Administration and Macroeconomic Issues
Punching below its weight
The global relevance of Canadian public administration? A bibliometric research note
Where power and scholarship collide
Why do some academic articles receive more citations from policy communities
The nexus of public administration, public policy, and nonprofit studies
Portfolio management
Understanding the Field of Public Affairs through the Lens of Ranked Ph.D. Programs in the United States
Legacy and Stewardship
Where Have You Gone, Harold Seidman
The 2017 John Gaus Award Lecture
Author cocitation
The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013)
Mapping world scientific collaboration
Co‐citation in the scientific literature
Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production
Trends in the Study of Public Administration
The Public Administration Review and Ongoing Struggles for Connectedness
Happy 75th, Public Administration Review
Contributions to the Public Administration Review
Who Contributes to Public Administration Review? Examining the Characteristics of Authors Who Submit Manuscripts to the Journal
Research Methodology in the "Public Administration Review," 1975-1984
A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research
Citation Rankings of Public Administration Journals
The Problem of Beauty Contest Scholarship in Public Administration— And a Possible Alternative
Public Administration Productivity
PAR ’s Social Equity Footprint
Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative
Research Note
Women, Research, and Mentorship in Public Administration
Public Administration Scholarship and the Politics of Coproducing Academic–Practitioner Research
Women in the American Society for Public Administration
Scholarly Collaboration and Productivity Patterns in Public Administration
Don't reinvent the wheel
Speaking what truth to whom? The uneasy relationship between practitioner and academic knowledge in public administration
Ties That Bind
Public Administration as an Interdisciplinary Field
Why PAR Matters
Public Administration Research
Public‐Sector Leadership Theory
Rationality and Influence in Public Service
Organizations of the Future
Faculty, Graduate Student, and Graduate Productivity in Public Administration and Public Affairs Programs, 1986-1993
The Science of Public Administration
How Can We Improve Our Science to Generate More Usable Knowledge for Public Professionals
Community Organization and Rural Development
Proverbs and the Evolution of Public Administration
The "Reinventing Government" Exercise
Public Administration Research from a Practitioner Perspective
Seeing the Forest for the Trees
Envisioning Public Administration as a Scholarly Field in 2020
Some Evidence of a Pluralistic Discipline
The Complementarity View
The State of the Discipline of Public Administration
Amplifying the Voices of Practitioners in PAR
Organizing in the Future
Leadership and Organizational Culture
The Troublesome Cleft
Network Bibliometrics of Public Policy Journals
Policy Journal Trends and Tensions
| Obras citantes distintas | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3,56 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 32 |