Environment, livelihood and household

This paper focuses on the changes occurring in households in the indigenous Rana Tharus community. I discuss the household not in terms of physical structure but instead on the social aspects: how people relate to each other through the lens of the household context. I argue that the fluid nature of households makes its flexible to different ecological environments and socio‐economic scenarios. My ethnography of Rana households clearly illustrated that the formation, structure and management of Rana households was fundamentally linked to people's livelihoods. Before 1950s, abundant land resources allowed Ranas to live in joint‐type households. This particular household arrangement not only fulfilled labour needs but also secured the mutual security for every household member. Gradually, undivided and big households (known in Rana as Badaghar ) became the ideal model for Ranas as soon as such establishments did not become divided or separated. This household structure also served as an important safety net for most Ranas and fundamental to other social relationships especially Mukhiya (household head system) and Kurmaa (patrilineal kin). However, since the 1950s, new socio‐economic landscapes have significantly challenged the maintenance of traditional Rana households. Within the lifetime of most Ranas, they first experienced household fission and the disappearance of the Mukhiya system. The dynamic relationships between Rana household and new ecological, social and economic landscapes are explored here. It is concluded that the household is a critical institution allowing anthropologists to better understand the long‐term social impacts caused by state policies and ecological changes. This is because people often practice their new household relations in their everyday life as a response to environmental and livelihood changes

Agriculture · Biology · Context (archaeology · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Household income · Indigenous · Institution · Livelihood · Social science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Ecology

• Settler Sensibilities and Environmental Change

  Amy K Johnson, Amy Johnson et al.•The Journal of Asian Studies•2023

  Incluir item

• Family and Household

  Yanagisako, S J Yanagisako•Annual Review of Anthropology•1979

  Incluir item

• Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities

  Marshall Sahlins•Historical metaphors and mythical…•1981

  Incluir item

• The evolution of the family

  Open Access•Jack Goody•Household and Family in Past Times•1972

  Incluir item

• Households

  R Wilk, E Arnould et al.•Households•1984

  Incluir item

• About the House

  Open Access•Roxana Waterson, Maurice Bloch et al.•About the House•1995

  Incluir item

• Family and Kinship in Western Europe

  Robert Wheaton•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1975

  Incluir item

• Many Tongues, One People

  Arjun Guneratne•Many Tongues, One People•2002

  Incluir item

• Himalayan Households

  Mead Cain, T Fricke et al.•Population and Development Review•1986

  Incluir item

• A Comparative and Etymological Dictionary of the Nepali Language

  W Norman Brown, Ralph Lilley Turner et al.•Journal of the American Oriental…•1931

  Incluir item

• Household Ecology

  O Nigel Bolland, R Wilk et al.•Hispanic American Historical Review•1992

  Incluir item

• Household and Community in African Studies

  Jane I Guyer•African Studies Review•1981

  Incluir item

• The Determinants of Family Structure in Rural South India

  John C Caldwell, P H Reddy et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1984

  Incluir item

• The Structure of the Peasant Family

  Open Access•Walter Goldschmidt, Evalyn Jacobson Kunkel•American Anthropologist•1971

  Incluir item

• On the Conditions Favoring Extended Family Households

  Burton Pasternak, C R Ember et al.•Journal of Anthropological Research•1976

  Incluir item