Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Control constitucional en el mundo contemporáneo - Retrospectiva y prospectiva

Dados Bibliográficos

ID11633988
AutoresDoreen Lustig (0000-0003-2053-8820, Universidad de Tel Aviv), Joseph H H Weiler (New York University)
Ano2021
Volume30
Fascículo2
Páginas244-334
Data de publicação2021-12-17
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoDíkaion (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0120-8942 • E-ISSN: 2027-5366
EditoraUniversity of La Sabana (PUBLISHER • CO)
DOI10.5294/dika.2021.30.2.1
OpenAlexW4200544804
IdiomaES
Referências citadas124

Nuestro propósito en este artículo es retomar, actualizar y revisar teóricamente Judicial Review in the Contemporary World, de Mauro Cappelletti, una obra que fue pionera en su tratamiento del control constitucional. El principal recurso cartográfico, en homenaje a Cappelletti, es la metáfora de la ola. Trazamos un mapa de tres olas globales de control constitucional dentro de un mismo orden constitucional, las cuales son secuenciales y están superpuestas geográficamente a nivel mundial. La primera ola es la serie de “revoluciones constitucionales” al interior de los ordenamientos jurídicos nacionales. La segunda ola es la aparición del derecho internacional como fuente de derecho superior que los tribunales utilizan en el ejercicio de su poder de control constitucional. La tercera ola es una respuesta y reacción a la primera y segunda olas: por un lado, el intento de los tribunales nacionales de suplir las lagunas democráticas e identitarias del Estado de derecho en el marco de la gobernanza transnacional (tener una voz). Por el otro, es el conjunto de casos en los que los tribunales (y los Estados) tratan de escapar de la primera o la segunda ola (el escape). La interacción entre las olas y sus características dialécticas constituyen el marco explicativo que ofrecemos en este artículo. Al destacar las relaciones dialécticas dentro de las olas y entre ellas, esperamos desafiar la narrativa dominante sobre los procesos de constitucionalización como algo progresivo y evolutivo

Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Ombudsman and Human Rights

  • On Law, Politics, and Judicialization

    Martin Shapiro, Alec Stone Sweet•On Law, Politics, and Judicializati…•2002

  • The Conservative Human Rights Revolution

    Marco Duranti•The Conservative Human Rights…•2017

  • Human Rights

    Makau Mutua•Human Rights•2002

  • The Transformation of Europe

    Joseph H H Weiler•The Yale Law Journal•1991

  • The Core of the Case against Judicial Review

    Jeremy Waldron•The Yale Law Journal•2006

  • Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law

    Open Access•John Ferejohn•Law and Contemporary Problems•2002

  • Democracy and Distrust

    John Hart Ely•Democracy and Distrust•1981

  • The Birth of Judicial Politics in France

    Alec Stone Sweet, Alec Stone•The birth of judicial politics in…•1992

  • Law and the Culture of Israel

    Menachem Mautner•Law and the Culture of Israel•2011

  • Lost Without Translation? Cross-Referencing and a New Global Community of Courts

    Wiener Wiener, Liste Liste•Indiana Journal of Global Legal…•2014

  • Introduction to Symposium on the Constitutionalization of International Law in Latin America

    Open Access•Alexandra Huneeus•AJIL Unbound•2015

  • Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes

    Open Access•Alec Stone Sweet, Thomas L Brunell•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • A cosmopolitan legal order

    Open Access•Alec Stone Sweet•Global Constitutionalism•2012

  • Comparative perspectives on judicial review in Lithuania

    Leonas Sabaliunas•Europe Asia Studies•1996

  • Government Lawyers and Non-judicial Constitutional Review in Estonia

    Nancy Maveety, Vello Pettai•Europe Asia Studies•2004

  • National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law

    Eyal Benvenisti, George W Downs•European Journal of International…•2009

  • Sovereignty and Inequality

    Benedict Kingsbury•European Journal of International…•1998

  • Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law

    Eyal Benvenisti•European Journal of International…•1993

  • Unity or Uniformity? Domestic Courts and Treaty Interpretation

    Open Access•Helmut Philipp Aust, Alejandro Rodiles et al.•Leiden Journal of International Law•2014

  • The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty

    Open Access•Mark A Graber•Studies in American Political…•1993

  • Confucian Constitutionalism? The Emergence of Constitutional Review in Korea and Taiwan

    Open Access•T Ginsburg•Law & Social Inquiry•2002

  • The Origins of Judicial Review

    Jack N Rakove•Stanford Law Review•1997

  • Less Democracy, More Courts

    Open Access•Alexei Trochev•Law & Society Review•2004

  • Judicial Review in Britain

    Open Access•Susan Sterett, Susan M Sterett•Comparative Political Studies•1994

  • Judicial Review in Modern Constitutional Systems

    Open Access•David R Deener, David Deener•American Political Science Review•1952

  • Interpose Your Friendly Hand”

    Open Access•Keith E Whittington•American Political Science Review•2005

  • Separation of Powers and the Growth of Judicial Review in Established Democracies (or Why Has the Model of Legislative Supremacy Mostly Been Withdrawn From Sale?)

    Stephen Gardbaum•The American Journal of…•2014

  • Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law

    Open Access•Anthea Roberts•International and Comparative Law…•2011

  • Reclaiming Democracy

    Open Access•Eyal Benvenisti•American Journal of International…•2008

  • Legitimacy in the International System

    Open Access•Thomas M Franck•American Journal of International…•1988

  • Guarding the Constitutionality of Laws in the Nordic Countries

    Jaakko Husa•The American Journal of…•2000

  • Kadi

    Open Access•Devika Hovell•Modern Law Review•2016

  • The Origins of Human Rights Regimes

    Open Access•Andrew Moravcsik, Andrew M Moravcsik•International Organization•2000

  • The Constitutional Adjudication Mosaic of Latin America

    Open Access•Patricio Navia, Julio Ríos-Figueroa•Comparative Political Studies•2005

  • Reluctantly Restoring Rights

    Foster, S Foster•Human Rights Law Review•2009

  • Race, Reform, and Retrenchment

    Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw•Harvard Law Review•1988

  • On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion

    Open Access•Zachary Elkins, Beth Simmons et al.•The Annals of the American…•2005

  • Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process

    Open Access•Jon Elster•Duke Law Journal•1995

  • The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism

    Stephen Gardbaum•The American Journal of…•2001

  • Global Constitutionalism and Judicial Activism in Taiwan

    Jou-Juo Chu•Journal of Contemporary Asia•2008

  • The Globalization of Liberalization

    Open Access•Beth A Simmons, Zachary Elkins•American Political Science Review•2004

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae