A Scoping Review of Transitions From Australian Youth Detention
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11637383 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Bonnie Rudd (Faculty of Health Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia), Steven Roche (0000-0001-5648-0953, School of Allied Health Australian Catholic University Canberra Australia, autor correspondente), Ruth Wagstaff (Faculty of Health Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 100-113 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-01-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Australian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ajs4.70094 |
| OpenAlex | W7125692275 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 39 |
Transitions from youth detention are central to short‐ and long‐term well‐being and recidivism outcomes for young people. This study aimed to map the extent of empirical research regarding young people's needs, experiences and influential factors when transitioning from Australian youth detention. A scoping review, conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, retrieved 540 documents and identified 14 studies from 1990 onward that met inclusion criteria. Qualitative studies ( n = 7) primarily highlighted the importance of external factors such as community, interpersonal and institutional conditions. Quantitative studies ( n = 7) mainly focused on individual factors, such as knowledge, lifetime substance use and psychiatric treatment. There were no transition interventions that tested post‐transition outcomes for young people in Australia. The study found preliminary evidence of the importance of reliable positive human connection in program staff, caseworkers and mentors and the importance of community awareness and interagency coordination. However, it also highlighted an absence of mixed‐methods studies or intervention outcome testing, which would be crucial to determining the common factors of successful transition programs. Future primary research to fill the gaps highlighted by this review is essential to ensure transition processes are meeting the needs of young people and the broader Australian community
Empirical research · Inclusion (mineral · Intervention (counseling · Project commissioning · Psychological intervention · Publishing · Qualitative research · Recidivism · Child Welfare and Adoption · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Prisma2020
The prevalence and impact of child maltreatment and other types of victimization in the UK
Youth Justice
Youth justice in Australia
Juvenile justice, mental health, and the transition to adulthood
Juvenile Justice, Young People and Human Rights in Australia
Young People Transitioning from Juvenile Justice to the Community
Times during transition for young people with complex support needs
The challenges of reintegrating Indigenous youth after their release from detention
Cruel and unusual punishment’
Young People Talk about Transitioning from Youth Detention to the Community
Transition services for incarcerated youth
Coming back home
Differentiating crossover youth
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |