Institutions and Urban Revitalization

The Case of Chelsea in New York City

Dados Bibliográficos

ID11670331
AutoresDavid Wilson (0000-0002-6800-6447, a Department of Geography, Indiana University at Indianapolis, 425 Agnes Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, autor correspondente)
Ano1987
Volume8
Fascículo2
Páginas129-145
Data de publicação1987-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoUrban Geography (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0272-3638 • E-ISSN: 1938-2847
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2747/0272-3638.8.2.129
OpenAlexW1972618430
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas11

The emergent institutionalist perspective in urban geography has recently been applied to explain neighborhood revitalization in a number of seminal analyses. This research on Chelsea in New York City extends this body of theory by considering how the effect of institutional activity on neighborhood revitalization is itself constrained by the activities of other institutions. The research examines the wide range of institutions whose conflicting objectives, values, and activities played a role in funneling reinvestment into Chelsea between 1970 and 1980. The results suggest that an understanding of the neighborhood revitalization process can be substantially advanced by focusing on the prerequisite social, political, and economic resources necessary for its unfolding. Local managers operate under subjective value orientationsbeing influenced themselves by the power of other competing and conflicting institutions- which control and direct access to scarce resources

Economic geography · Geography · Perspective (graphical · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Regional science · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Law · Public Administration · Urban Planning and Governance · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies · Urbanization and City Planning