Municipal Rebate Programs for Environmental Retrofits

When policies incentivize voluntary activities that also take place in the absence of the incentive, it is critical to identify the additionality of the policy—that is, the degree to which the policy results in actions that would not have occurred otherwise. Rebate programs have become a common conservation policy tool for local municipalities seeking to retrofit residential properties with efficient appliances. This research evaluates whether such rebates can be cost‐effective means for water utilities to promote water conservation. A unique database is developed that combines water‐use data over a three‐year period for all households that participated in a utility's high‐efficiency toilet (HET) rebate program, water‐use data for a matched sample of neighbors who did not receive a rebate, and a survey of rebate participants. Difference‐in‐differences models indicate that installation of an HET reduces household water consumption by approximately 7 percent. While installation of an HET appears to be an effective means for achieving household reductions in water consumption, our results also suggest that the rebate program is a much less effective means for achieving household reductions in water consumption. Specifically, the rebate program is found to provide limited additional water savings beyond what would have occurred naturally and is responsible for only 37 percent of the total water reduction attributable to the installation of HETs over the study period. © 2013 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management

Additionality · Business · Consumption (sociology · Economics · Environmental economics · Incentive · Microeconomics · Natural resource economics · Public economics · Sample (material · Toilet · Water conservation · Water consumption · Water resource management · Water resources · Water use · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Energy Efficiency and Management · Environmental Science · Water resources management and optimization

• How Effective Are Building Codes at Reducing Residential Water Use? Evidence From California Billing Data

  Open Access•Mehdi Nemati•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2026

  Incluir item

• Scope and limitations of drought management within complex human–natural systems

  Open Access•William K Jaeger, Adell L Amos et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  Incluir item

• Efficient water-using technologies and habits

  Open Access•María Pérez Urdiales, Maria A García-Valiñas•Ecological Economics•2016

  Incluir item

• How Managers Can Reduce Household Water Use Through Communication

  Open Access•Heather Hodges, Colin Kuehl et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2020

  Incluir item

• Saving the Water in California

  Open Access•Kimberly Benjamin Hoppin, Elizabeth Meshes•Behavior and Social Issues•2022

  Incluir item

• Climate Change and Six Americas

  Open Access•Elizabeth Meshes, Lincoln Z Kamau et al.•Behavior and Social Issues•2022

  Incluir item

• Water conservation through plumbing and nudging

  Open Access•Sumit Agarwal, Eduardo Araral et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  Incluir item

• Mail and telephone surveys

  Don A Dillman•Mail and telephone surveys•1978

  Incluir item

• Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey

  Open Access•Lorna A Greening, D L Greene et al.•Energy Policy•2000

  Incluir item

• Social norms and energy conservation

  Open Access•Hunt Allcott•Journal of Public Economics•2011

  Incluir item

• Multivariate Matching Methods That Are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding

  M Iacu, Stefano M Iacus et al.•Journal of the American…•2011

  Incluir item

• Mostly Harmless Econometrics

  Joshua D Angrist, Jorn‐steffen Pischke et al.•Mostly Harmless Econometrics•2009

  Incluir item