Golden Ears and Meter Readers
The Contest for Epistemic Authority in Audiophilia
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11923959 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Marc Perlman (0000-0002-1269-3882, Brown University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2004 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 783-807 |
| Data de publicação | 2004-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Studies of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0306312704047613 |
| OpenAlex | W2160067432 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 25 |
| Referências citadas | 15 |
Scientific claims to knowledge and the uses of technological artifacts are both inherently contestable, but both are not usually contested together. Consumers of ‘specialty’ audio equipment (known as the ‘high end’), however, connect both forms of resistance. These ‘audiophiles’ construct their own universe of meaning around their equipment; they cultivate a distinctive vocabulary and set of attitudes. In this they resemble other groups of users dedicated to supposedly antiquated technology. But they also engage in controversy to defend themselves against knowledge-claims that would delegitimize their universe of meaning. These debates concern recording formats or media (the relative merits of the compact disk [CD] and long-playing record [LP]), user ‘tweaks’ of purchased equipment, and the supposed audibility of differences between different brands of amplifiers, cables, or CD players. In all of these cases, audiophiles resist the claims of audio engineering by privileging their personal experiences, and they argue against scientific methodologies that seem to expose those experiences as illusory. Some of these patterns of epistemic contestation resemble those in non-musical domains (such as biomedicine). But audiophiles also make epistemic use of values crucial to their identity as music-lovers. They appeal to a common understanding of music as an exemplary locus of subjectivity, emotion, and self-surrender, in order to ward off the criticisms directed at them from a science they construe as objective, detached, and dispassionate
Aesthetics · Appeal · Construct (python library · Epistemology · Identity (music · Meaning (existential · Political science · Resistance (ecology · Sociology · Subjectivity · Computer Science · Diverse Musicological Studies · Law · Music History and Culture · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Philosophy
The Sociology of Music
Sound Histories
“The Silent Partner”
Rethinking criticism about lossy compression
Post-Fidelity
Sound Studies
Engineering the Performance
What was Lo-Fi
Sensing Vinyl
Everyday Fidelity”
Latent Elements in Pop Music Production
The online forum as a digital space of curation
Issue-oriented hackathons as material participation
Hainbach and the Sound of Destruction
Shibboleths in the studio
California Noise
The ineffable
Sounding the field
The Joy of Science
The Software Slump
Audiophile cultures
"Hearing" ahead of the sound
You have got such a beautiful symphony in front of you!' Use and resistance to mobile music devices among adventurers
Listening for the hiss
Noise reduction
From the Shadows
The Social construction of technological systems
How Users Matter
Sheepfarming after Chernobyl
"Testing - One, Two, Three … Testing!"
The Construction of Lay Expertise
Turn it down!' she shrieked
Users as Agents of Technological Change
The Fine-Tuning of a Golden Ear
Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination
Challenging medicine? Bodybuilding, drugs and risk
| Obras citantes distintas | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,14 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2004 - 2025 (22) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 25 |