The Imperial Constitution of the Law Officers of the Crown

The rule of conquest came to receive different applications for different parts of the British Empire. How this happened, and who was responsible for it happening, are the interests of this article. Calling upon court reports, parliamentary records, and correspondence between various officeholders in the early Hanoverian government, attention will be drawn in particular to the attorney general and the solicitor general (the law officers of the crown) and the advice they offered upon the governance of colonies between 1719 and 1774. Focusing upon the conventions that pertain to war and conquest in Ireland, the Caribbean, India, and North America, this article reveals inconsistency in doctrine, but consistency in the procedures by which law officers of the crown acquired influence over proceedings in the houses of parliament and in the courts of common law and equity. Just as often in their formal capacities as in their informal capacities, the attorney general and the solicitor general were pivotal to the development of the imperial constitution, in constant response, as they were, to the peculiar demands of various colonies and plantations in the British Empire

British Empire · Colonialism · Constitution · Doctrine · Empire · Government (linguistics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Australian History and Society · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Philosophy

• A Companion to the American Revolution

  Jack P Greene, J R Pole•Companion to the American…•2000

  Incluir item

• Professors of the Law

  David Lemmings•Professors of the Law•2000

  Incluir item

• The Province of Legislation Determined

  Open Access•David Lieberman•Province of Legislation Determined•1989

  Incluir item

• Whigs and Hunters

  Edward Palmer Thompson•Whigs and Hunters•1990

  Incluir item

• Imperial Meridian

  C A Bayly•Imperial Meridian•2016

  Incluir item

• Imperial Challenge

  Philip Lawson•Imperial Challenge•1989

  Incluir item

• Africa and the Victorians

  R Robinson, John Gallagher et al.•Africa and the Victorians•1961

  Incluir item

• The Company-State

  Philip J Stern•The company-state•2011

  Incluir item

• A “Manifest Violation” of the Rights of Englishmen

  Open Access•Lee B Wilson•Law and History Review•2015

  Incluir item

• Empire and Revolution

  Open Access•Richard Bourke, R Michael Bourke•Princeton University Press eBooks•2015

  Incluir item

• Constitutional History of the First British Empire

  O M Dickerson, A Berreidale Keith•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1931

  Incluir item

• A Constitutional History of India

  W P M Kennedy, A Berriedale Keith•University of Toronto Law Journal•1937

  Incluir item

• Peripheries and Center

  John V Orth, Jack P Greene•Journal of American History•1987

  Incluir item

• The Rockingham Whigs in Transition

  Warren M Elofson•The English Historical Review•1989

  Incluir item

• Lord Hillsborough, Samuel Wharton and the Ohio Grant, 1769–1775

  Peter Marshall•The English Historical Review•1965

  Incluir item

• Colonial Self-Government

  Open Access•John M Ward•Colonial Self-Government•1976

  Incluir item

• Rage for Order

  Lauren Benton, Lisa Ford•Rage for Order•2016

  Incluir item

• MR Attorney General and the Politicians

  Open Access•Rose Melikan, R A MELIKAN•The Historical Journal•1997

  Incluir item

• Robert Clive, the ‘Black Jagir’, and British Politics

  Open Access•Bruce Lenman, Bruce P Lenman et al.•The Historical Journal•1983

  Incluir item

• The Politics of the Judiciary

  Open Access•John A G Griffith•Verfassung in Recht und Übersee•1978

  Incluir item

• The Uprising Against the East India Company

  Open Access•Arthur Meier Schlesinger•Political Science Quarterly•1917

  Incluir item