Towards an educational case for social and political issues in the geography curriculum
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11951720 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Alexander Standish (0000-0003-4170-0823, Institute of Education, University College London , 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL , United Kingdom, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 495-513 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-01-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Philosophy of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0309-8249 • E-ISSN: 1467-9752 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jopedu/qhae013 |
| OpenAlex | W4391344274 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 20 |
Whilst social and political issues have an important role in the geography curriculum, the long-term erosion of the value and insularity of disciplinary knowledge in society and the curriculum has blurred the distinction between educational aims and political advocacy in classrooms. Increasingly, teachers, policymakers, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) instrumentalize the curriculum with respect to their political objectives, including climate change and social injustice. In taking an advocacy approach to pedagogy, they potentially undermine liberal educational objectives, including the development of autonomy and subjectification. Drawing on recent work in philosophy of education (e.g. Biesta; Van Poeck, and Östman) as well as social realist approaches to knowledge, I make a case for teaching about social and political issues on liberal educational grounds. Geography plays a key role in the school curriculum by providing a space for exploring the human condition through the study of people in contrasting environments and cultural systems. Here, we examine how geography teachers can handle issues in a morally careful way and navigate a line between advocacy and educational aims. One key difference examined is the need to treat students as subjects in their own right and to help develop skills of moral enquiry. In practice this means encouraging an open-ended approach, exploring topics (and the values underpinning them) from a range of perspectives, developing sensitivity to difference, and showing tolerance for ideas of which one disapproves. For students to develop agency and moral independence, they must learn how to think about social and political issues rather than be told what to think
Curriculum · Curriculum development · Economic growth · Economics · Education theory · Epistemology · Higher education · Human geography · Pedagogy · Philosophy of education · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Geography Education and Pedagogy · Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Liberalism, Pluralism, and Political Education
Confronting the deafening silence on race in geography education in England
The State and the Politics of Knowledge
Thinking Geographically
Knowledge and racial violence
The Risk and Potentiality of Engaging with Sustainability Problems in Education—A Pragmatist Teaching Approach
Educating Beyond Cultural Diversity
A Theory of Moral Education
Who Are “We”? An Important Question for Geography's Future
Decolonising geographical knowledges
Mainstreaming geography's decolonial imperative
Critical Social Theory and Transformative Knowledge
Becoming public
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |