Reproductive Justice in the Post-Roe v. Wade Era
Examining Reactions to Dobbs v. Jackson and Psychological Distress Among Cisgender Women and People Assigned Female at Birth
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12005404 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Laurel B Watson (0000-0003-2539-4467, University of Missouri–Kansas City, autor correspondente), Jacob M Germain (University of Missouri–Kansas City) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 163-179 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-11-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Psychology of Women Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0361-6843 • E-ISSN: 1471-6402 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/03616843231210219 |
| OpenAlex | W4388417552 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 53 |
In the present study, we examined relations among reactions to the Dobbs v. Jackson court ruling (heretofore adverse reactions), psychological distress, collective action, and abortion history among cisgender women and people assigned female at birth. Specifically, we examined the ways in which the relation between adverse reactions to the Dobbs v. Jackson decision and psychological distress may vary according to involvement in reproductive justice and antiabortion collective action and abortion history. Results ( n = 894) revealed that adverse reactions were significantly positively related to psychological distress. Furthermore, involvement in reproductive justice collective action was significantly positive to psychological distress whereas the relation between antiabortion collective action and psychological distress was nonsignificant. The positive relation between adverse reactions and psychological distress was exacerbated by high levels of involvement in reproductive justice and weakened by low levels of involvement in antiabortion collective action, and these relations did not vary according to abortion history. In addition, the relation between involvement in antiabortion collective action and psychological distress was significant and positive among those who had had an abortion and nonsignificant for those who had not. These findings reveal the importance of mental health providers attending to their clients’ abortion-related beliefs and histories, involvement in collective action, and psychological distress. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ's website at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843231210219
Abortion · Action (physics · Collective action · Distress · Economic Justice · Mental health · Political science · Politics · Pregnancy · Psychiatry · Psychological distress · Reproductive justice · Clinical Psychology · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Law · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies
“The Call is [Also] Coming From Inside the House”
The Pregnancy-Related Objectification Beliefs Scale (PROBS)
Reproductive Justice for All
Introduction to the Special Issue on Gender-Based Violence
Abortion Stigma and Dehumanization as Reproductive Control
The Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Young Women's Experiences of Objectification and Sexual Well-Being
Mobilizing for Reproductive Justice
Navigating Abortion Stigma
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy-Related Deaths — United States, 2007–2016
The Giving Voice to Mothers study
Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression
The Dual Process Motivational Model of Ideology and Prejudice
The structure of negative emotional states
Reproductive Justice
The relations among microaggressions, collective action, and psychological outcomes among sexual minority Latinx people
Abortion Stigma
Authoritarian attitudes are associated with higher autonomic reactivity to stress and lower recovery
A Prospective Cohort Study of the Effect of Receiving versus Being Denied an Abortion on Educational Attainment
Side Effects, Physical Health Consequences, and Mortality Associated with Abortion and Birth after an Unwanted Pregnancy
Bisexual women’s discrimination and mental health outcomes
Resilience and collective action
Attitudes Toward Abortion After Receiving vs. Being Denied an Abortion in the USA
Pro-choice and Pro-life Are Not Enough
Group-Level Coping as a Moderator Between Heterosexism and Sexism and Psychological Distress in Sexual Minority Women
Toward an Intersectional Psychological Science of Reproductive Norms
Rising Up, Pushing Forward
The Protective Power of Collective Action for Sexual Minority Women of Color
The US in Uterus
Sexual-Minority College Women's Experiences with Discrimination
Exploring Sexual Minority Women’s Experiences of External and Internalized Heterosexism and Sexism and their Links to Coping and Distress
Relations Among Dimensions of Feminism and Internalized Heterosexism in Lesbians and Bisexual Women
Rhetorics of reproductive justice and injustice in the aftermath of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Counseling Psychology and Reproductive Justice
Handling Item-Level Missing Data
A Moderated Mediation Test of Minority Stress
Abortion Knowledge and Attitudes Among Psychologists and Graduate Students
A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
A Concomitant Examination of the Relations of Perceived Racist and Sexist Events to Psychological Distress for African American Women
Women Deserve Better
Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group
Abortion as stigma
Conceptualising abortion stigma
I wouldn't even know where to start
A power primer
Different and Not Equal
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |