Does Race Matter in Landowners' Participation in Conservation Incentive Programs
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12165019 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jianbang Gan (0000-0001-6799-313X, Texas A&M University, autor correspondente), Okwudili O Onianwa (Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University), John Schelhas (0009-0004-0233-3391, Southern Research Station), Gerald C Wheelock (Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University), Mark R Dubois (Auburn University) |
| Ano | 2005 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 431-445 |
| Data de publicação | 2005-05-01 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Society & Natural Resources (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0894-1920 • E-ISSN: 1521-0723 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08941920590924792 |
| OpenAlex | W2033188318 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 17 |
| Referências citadas | 17 |
This study investigated and compared the participation behavior of white and minority small landowners in Alabama in eight conservation incentive programs. Using nonparametric tests and logit modeling, we found both similarities and differences in participation behavior between these two landowner groups. Both white and minority landowners tended not to participate in conservation incentive programs, and were equally likely to participate in the overall programs, Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), Stewardship Incentives Program (SIP), and Forestry Incentives Program (FIP). White landowners, however, were enrolled in the CRP longer and signed up more acres in the CRP and FIP than minorities. Moreover, minorities were more likely to be dissatisfied with program participation and to be unable to afford the cost share. The determinants for program participation vary with program and racial/ethnic background. We suggest new approaches to encouraging program participation by small landowners in general and by minority landowners in particular
Agriculture · Business · Conservation Reserve Program · Economics · Ethnic group · Geography · Incentive · Incentive program · Land tenure · Logit · Microeconomics · Political science · Public economics · Stewardship (theology · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Forest Management and Policy
Landowners and Conservation
Social vulnerability and family forest owners in the United States
Does forestry pay? Case studies of four African American family forestland owners in Georgia, United States
A systematic map of factors contributing to Black forestland loss and retention in the United States
How do landowners perceive and respond to incentives for sustainable forest management? A synthesis to inform discussions on programs for climate-smart forestry
Exploring Diversity in Forest Management Outlooks of African American Family Forest Landowners for Ensuring Sustainability of Forestry Resources in the Southern United States
A Rapid Mapping Review of Studies on the Motivations and Barriers to Participation in the Conservation Reserve Program
Utilization of Property Among African American Heir and Titled Landowners in Alabama’s Black Belt
Locating benefits
Incentivizing climate-smart forestry
Family forest owners and federal taxes
Do ownership structures effect forest management? An analysis of African American family forest landowners
Exploring forest owners’ perspectives and their willingness to accept incentives to adopt climate-smart forestry practices in South Carolina, USA
Where farm and forest meet
An Exploration ofAfricanAmerican Forest Landowners inMississippi
A 'cultural transformation' at the US Department of Agriculture
Integrating Research and Outreach for Environmental Justice
Mail and telephone surveys
Mail and Internet Surveys
Government Programs, Small Farm Research, and Assistance for Limited Resource Black Farmers in Alabama
Men, women, and the environment
Ownership matters
Effects of the changing structure of agriculture on nonwhite farming in the U.S., the South, and Georgia
Mailed Questionnaire Surveys and the Reluctant Respondent
Response Bias and the Need for Extensive Mail Questionnaire Follow-ups Among Selected Recreation Samples
| Citações por ano | 0,94 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2008 - 2026 (19) |
| Altamente citado | Não |