Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Impact of Phantom Decoys on Choices and Perceptions

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12166372
AutoresDaniele Scarpi (0000-0001-9652-9109, University of Bologna Department of Management Bologna BO Italy, autor correspondente), Giancarlo Pizzi (0000-0002-7531-9003, University of Bologna), Gabriele Pizzi (University of Bologna Department of Management Bologna BO Italy)
Ano2012
Volume26
Fascículo5
Páginas451-461
Data de publicação2012-11-13
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/bdm.1778
OpenAlexW1941814584
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas31

Phantoms are dominating, attractive alternatives that are unavailable at the time of choice. They occupy different positions in the attribute space, and their unavailability can be either known or unknown to individuals. Although different theories have offered explanations for the influence that phantoms exert on individual choices, they have largely overlooked phantom knowledge. Contradictory predictions can be drawn from these theories, and none provides a good account of the pattern of effects that emerges from our data. We suggest that these contradictions appear because the different theories do not address phantom location and knowledge jointly. When considering phantom knowledge together with location, we observe a consistent overall pattern of effects that encompasses all predictions that could be made on the basis of each theory. We find that known phantoms are stronger when close, and favor the target product, whereas unknown phantoms are stronger when far, and favor the competitor. Finally, we look beyond shifts in choice shares and find that phantom decoys can also affect individuals' post‐choice evaluations and reactions in terms of perceived justice, decision satisfaction, and repatronage intention. Our results show that post‐choice evaluations are driven by phantom knowledge, not phantom location. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Affect (linguistics · Cognitive psychology · Imaging phantom · Perception · Physics · Product (mathematics · Statistics · Unavailability · Communication · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Mathematics · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Psychology

  • Framing context effects with reference points

    Open Access•Andrea M Cataldo, Andrew L Cohen•Cognition•2020

  • The influence of distance between decoy and target on context effect

    Open Access•Jiejie Liao, Yujie Chen et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2020

  • Contrast effects in judgmental forecasting when assessing the implications of worst and best case scenarios

    Open Access•Paul Goodwin, M Sinan Gönül et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2019

  • The Phantom Decoy Effect in Perceptual Decision Making

    Open Access•Jennifer S Trueblood, Jonathan C Pettibone•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2015

  • The Impact of “Display‐Set” Options on Decision‐Making

    Open Access•Uma R Karmarkar•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2016

  • The impact of tourism on residents' intention to stay. A qualitative comparative analysis

    Open Access•Daniele Scarpi, Ilenia Confente et al.•Annals of Tourism Research•2022

  • Hidden Redemption and the Duty to Play the Villain

    Shmuel Nili•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice

    Open Access•Ravi Dhar, Itamar Simonson•Journal of Marketing Research•2003

  • Choice in Context

    Itamar Simonson, Amos Tversky•Journal of Marketing Research•1992

  • Choice in Context

    Open Access•Itamar Simonson, Amos Tversky•Journal of Marketing Research•1992

  • Scarcity effects on value

    Open Access•Maria Lynn, Michael Lynn•Psychology and Marketing•1991

  • A Theory of Procedure

    John Thibaut, Laurens Walker•California Law Review•1978

  • Testing alternative explanations of phantom decoy effects

    Open Access•Jonathan C Pettibone, Douglas H Wedell•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2007

  • Consumer Response to Stockouts

    Gavan J Fitzsimons•Journal of Consumer Research•2000

  • On the pursuit and misuse of useless information

    Anthony Bastardi, Eldar Shafir•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  • Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice

    T R Tyler•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • Asymmetric Decoy Effects on Lower-Quality Versus Higher-Quality Brands

    Timothy B Heath, Subimal Chatterjee•Journal of Consumer Research•1995

  • Toward Understanding the Attraction Effect

    Srinivasan Ratneshwar, Allan D Shocker et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1987

  • Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives

    Joel Huber, John W Payne et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1982

  • The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice Deferral

    Ravi Dhar, Stephen M Nowli et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1999

  • Knowledge, Information Mode, and the Attraction Effect

    Sankar Sen•Journal of Consumer Research•1998

  • Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace

    Open Access•Robert Folger•Social Justice Research•1987

Obras citantes distintas7
Citações por ano0,64
Intervalo de citações2015 - 2024 (10)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae