Evaluation of the CAN SPAM Act

E-mail spam has been growing since its inception. The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN SPAM Act) is U.S. federal legislation that was passed in response to the growing spam problem. A series of evaluations followed after the Act, most of which reported that compliance with the Act’s requirements among spammers had not been affected. However, none of these evaluations used methods that were sufficiently rigorous, failing to capture the continuous nature of CAN SPAM Act’s enforcement, using a limited number of measures of noncompliance, and ignoring a variety of possible spurious influences. This research addresses all of these limitations by analyzing a sample of 5,490,905 spam e-mails sent between 1998 and 2013. Ten measures of spammer compliance with the CAN SPAM Act were operationalized to test the impact the Act had. Thirteen measures of CAN SPAM Act enforcement were coded from news articles and included in a time-series regression. Findings suggest that the Act may in fact be a deterrent, but in such a way as to increase CAN SPAM Act violations of header forgery as a precaution against being caught

Business · Compliance (psychology · Computer security · Credibility · Enforcement · Forum spam · Internet privacy · Law enforcement · Legislation · Political science · Sample (material · Spambot · Spamming · Test (biology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Law · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Psychology · Spam and Phishing Detection

• Rethinking cybercrime prevention in the age of the internet

  Open Access•Thomas J Holt, Kevin F Steinmetz•Crime Law and Social Change•2025

  Incluir item

• Illegal Roaming and File Manipulation on Target Computers

  Open Access•Alexander Testa, David Maimon et al.•Criminology & Public Policy•2017

  Incluir item

• Malicious Spam Distribution

  Robert C Perkins, C Jordan Howell et al.•Deviant Behavior•2022

  Incluir item

• Interrupted Time Series Analysis

  David Mcdowall, Richard Mccleary et al.•Interrupted Time Series Analysis•1980

  Incluir item

• The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

  J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  Incluir item

• Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence

  Carol Trilling, Jack P Gibbs•The Journal of Criminal Law and…•1976

  Incluir item

• The Theory and Practice of Econometrics

  Roman Frydman, George G Judge et al.•Journal of Business and Economic…•1985

  Incluir item

• Low Self-Control and Social Learning in Understanding Students' Intentions to Pirate Movies in the United States

  Open Access•George E Higgins, Brian D Fell et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2007

  Incluir item

• Deterrence

  Franklin E Zimring, Franklin Zimring et al.•Stanford Law Review•1973

  Incluir item

• Restrictive Deterrent Effects of a Warning Banner in an Attacked Computer System

  Open Access•David Maimon, Mariel Alper et al.•Criminology•2014

  Incluir item

• The Economics of Spam

  Open Access•Justin M Rao, David H Reiley et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2012

  Incluir item