Legal Protection as Competition for Jurisdiction
The Case of Refugee Protection through Law in the Past and at Present
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12186756 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Bas Schotel (0000-0002-9203-1001, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 9-32 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-11-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Leiden Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0922-1565 • E-ISSN: 1478-9698 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0922156517000565 |
| OpenAlex | W2768128001 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 27 |
This article explores the structure of the legal protection of refugees in Europe today. To this end, it will contrast historical arrangements providing protection to refugees, namely church asylum in the late Middle Ages and refuge for religious minorities, with the current European refugee regime, that is the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), in particular the Dublin system. The central claim of this article is that a basic condition for the legal protection of refugees is the existence of multiple jurisdictions, which in turn caters for competition for jurisdiction. The official logic of the CEAS, however, endorses harmonization, unity and the hierarchy of jurisdictions rather than a competition between jurisdictions. This partially explains the difficulties under the CEAS in organizing the protection of refugees through law. In policy terms, this article supports calls for reconsidering the Dublin Regulation, since through the ‘single jurisdiction’ approach Dublin hampers the legal protection of refugees
Competition (biology · Harmonization · Hierarchy · Jurisdiction · Political science · Refugee · Refugee law · European and International Law Studies · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People
Asylum Seekers in Europe
Reflections on Refoulement and Collective Expulsion in the Hirsi Case
ICC Witnesses and Acquitted Suspects Seeking Asylum in the Netherlands
Systemic Flaws' and Dublin Transfers
The Discretion of States in the Dublin III System for Determining Responsibility for Examining Applications for Asylum
Asylum as a General Principle of International Law
Regional Approaches to the Protection of Asylum Seekers
The Recast Process of the EU Asylum System
The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the Right to be Granted Asylum in the Union's Law
The European Union Asylum Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon and the Stockholm Programme
Hospitality, Protection and Refuge in Early English Law
The Dawn of International Refugee Protection
Refugees and Refugee Protection in the Early Modern Period
Diplomatic Asylum and the Assange Case
Watered-Down Rights on the High Seas
The European Tradition of Asylum and the Development of Refugee Law
The normative origins of democracy in the European Union
Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy or the Strasbourg Court versus Extraterritorial Migration Control
We are against a multi-ethnic society
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,29 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2020 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |