In Pursuit of a Pacific Strategy

This article seeks to explain why the British pushed for a role in Pacific operations during the Second World War when it faced other strategic priorities in Southeast Asia, as well as a powerful American military that maintained tight control over operational decision-making. Although several quarters in Whitehall, including the Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, had doubts about the necessity of a Pacific strategy, there were sensible reasons behind pursuing such a course. It would illustrate to an “anti-imperialist” America that Britain was not only interested in recovering its colonial possessions but also prepared to fight the Japanese on their homeland. More importantly, taking part in the main operations would allow the British to claim a voice at the peace table while helping to encourage the Americans to cement their close working relationship with Britain in the postwar period

Advertising · Asia pacific · Business · Colonialism · Economic history · Ethnology · Homeland · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Prime minister · Round table · Sociology · History · Law · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies · World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact

• The Architect of Victory

  Open Access•Peter J Dean•Architect of Victory•2011

  Incluir item

• The Foreign Office and Post-war Planning for East Asia, 1944–45

  Christopher Baxter•Contemporary British History•2006

  Incluir item

• Britain and Hiroshima

  Jacques E C Hymans•Journal of Strategic Studies•2009

  Incluir item

• Strategy, Fleet Logistics, and the Lethbridge Mission to the Pacific and Indian Oceans 1943–1944

  Chris Madsen•Journal of Strategic Studies•2008

  Incluir item