Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Negative-emissions technology portfolios to meet the 1.5 °C target

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12260751
AutoresOscar Rueda (0000-0003-0027-5605, Leiden University, autor correspondente), José M Mogollón (0000-0002-7110-5470, Leiden University), Arnold Tukker (0000-0002-8229-2929, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research), Laura Scherer (0000-0002-0194-9942, Leiden University)
Ano2021
Volume67
Páginas102238-102238
Data de publicação2021-02-19
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoGlobal Environmental Change (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0959-3780 • E-ISSN: 1872-9495
EditoraElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102238
OpenAlexW3129646174
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas17
Referências citadas45

Our carbon-intensive economy has led to an average temperature rise of 1 °C since pre-industrial times. As a consequence, the world has seen increasing droughts, significant shrinking of the polar ice caps, and steady sea-level rise. To stall these issues’ worsening further, we must limit global warming to 1.5 °C. In addition to the economy’s decarbonization, this endeavour requires the use of negative-emissions technologies (NETs) that remove the main greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, from the atmosphere. While techno-economic feasibility alone has driven the definition of negative-emissions solutions, NETs’ diverse, far-reaching implications demand a more holistic assessment. Here, we present a comprehensive framework, integrating NETs’ critical performance aspects of feasibility, effectiveness, and side impacts, to define the optimal technology mix within realistic outlooks. The resulting technology portfolios provide a useful new benchmark to compare carbon avoidance and removal measures and deliberately choose the best path to solve the climate emergency

Benchmark (surveying · Business · Climate change · Economics · Environmental economics · Global warming · Greenhouse gas · Natural resource economics · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Computer Science · Environmental Science

  • One step closer

    Open Access•Linda Engelmann, Katrin Arning et al.•Energy Sustainability and Society•2024

  • Is seeking certainty in climate sensitivity measures counterproductive in the context of climate emergency? The case for scenario planning

    Open Access•Jonathan Derbyshire, James Derbyshire et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • A protein transition can free up land to tap vast energy and negative emission potentials

    Open Access•Oscar Rueda, José M Mogollón et al.•One Earth•2024

  • Integrated assessment of carbon dioxide removal portfolios

    Open Access•Solène Chiquier, Angelo Costa Gurgel et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Fairness and feasibility in deep mitigation pathways with novel carbon dioxide removal considering institutional capacity to mitigate

    Open Access•Matthew Gidden, Elina Brutschin et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • The coupled uncertainties in carbon dioxide removal and transient climate response to cumulative CO 2 emissions

    Open Access•Carla Maria Di Natale, Theresa Schaber et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Deep uncertainty in carbon dioxide removal portfolios

    Open Access•Quirina Rodriguez Mendez, Felix Creutzig et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • The public use of early-stage scientific advances in carbon dioxide removal

    Open Access•Giorgio Tripodi, Fabrizio Lillo et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Frameworks to assess climate change responses—a systematic analysis to enhance frameworks for carbon dioxide removal

    Open Access•Felix Gulde, Maximilian Witting et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Expert projections on the development and application of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage technologies

    Open Access•Tobias Heimann, Lara-Sophie Wähling et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Afforesting arid land with renewable electricity and desalination to mitigate climate change

    Open Access•Upeksha Caldera, Christian Breyer•Nature Sustainability•2023

  • The role of framing in public support for direct air capture

    Open Access•Daniel Sloot, Ann Bostrom•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Lifestyle change modelling for climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Laura Scherer, Mariësse A E van Sluisveld et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  • Overshoot, potential air pollution co-benefits and food shortages

    Open Access•Li-Jing Liu, Qiao‐Mei Liang et al.•Global Environmental Change•2025

  • Governing-by-aspiration? Assessing the nature and implications of including negative emission technologies (NETs) in country long-term climate strategies

    Open Access•Heather Jacobs, Aarti Gupta et al.•Global Environmental Change•2023

  • Mitigation deterrence and unrealistic expectations

    Open Access•Camilla Moioli, Laurent Drouet et al.•Global Environmental Change•2025

  • Advocating afforestation, betting on BECCS

    Pamela Mcelwee•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2023

  • An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways

    Open Access•Giulia Realmonte, Laurent Drouet et al.•Nature Communications•2019

  • The global tree restoration potential

    Open Access•Jean‐françois Bastin, Yelena Finegold et al.•Science•2019

  • Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon

    Open Access•Su Lin Lewis, Charlotte Wheeler et al.•Nature•2019

  • The trouble with negative emissions

    Open Access•Kevin Anderson, Glen P Peters et al.•Science•2016

  • Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges

    Open Access•Nathalie Seddon, Alexandre M Chausson et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2020

  • Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks

    Open Access•Jessica Strefler, Thorben Amann et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Between Scylla and Charybdis

    Open Access•Jessica Strefler, Nico Bauer et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Negative emissions—Part 2

    Open Access•Sabine Fuss, William F Lamb et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Negative emissions—Part 1

    Open Access•Jan C Minx, William F Lamb et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5 °C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal

    Open Access•Christian Holz, Lori Siegel et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Negative emissions—Part 3

    Open Access•Gregory F Nemet, Max Callaghan et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Land-based negative emissions

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Sivan Kartha•International Environmental…•2017

  • The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2

    Open Access•Oliver Fricko, Peter Havlík et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Mapping feasibilities of greenhouse gas removal

    Open Access•Johanna Forster, Naomi E Vaughan et al.•Global Environmental Change•2020

Obras citantes distintas17
Citações por ano4,25
Intervalo de citações2022 - 2025 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 17
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae