Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Pretty Boring Stuff

District Judges and Housing Possession Proceedings

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12282997
AutoresD Cowan (0000-0001-9750-8262, University of Bristol, autor correspondente), Emma Hitchings (0000-0003-4538-694X, University of Bristol)
Ano2007
Volume16
Fascículo3
Páginas363-382
Data de publicação2007-08-20
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSocial & Legal Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0964-6639 • E-ISSN: 1461-7390
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0964663907079764
OpenAlexW2152959872
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas29
Referências citadas19

In this article, we demonstrate how judgecraft, though mundane in the context of housing possession proceedings in England, involves the client-processing mentality suggested in Lipsky's work on street-level bureaucracy. Although they may be regarded as mundane, the consequences of these proceedings may well be dire, producing homelessness and other forms of extreme housing need. Lipsky helps us, because his work enables us to think about the factors that make up `being a District Judge'. Having discussed the background to housing possession proceedings, including their growth, we discuss this client-processing mentality in the context of the ways in which District Judges seek to control their clients as well as processes in the courtroom. Repeat-players are moulded by individual District Judges through routines, discipline, and just knowing what is expected. In particular, crucial decisions are made as to the worthiness of claimants and occupiers. As a result, relationships of trust develop which facilitate a `rubber-stamping' approach. In the conclusion, we reflect on the value of Lipsky's work as well as its limits in this context

Archaeology · Bureaucracy · Context (archaeology · Criminology · Political science · Politics · Possession (linguistics · Public relations · Sociology · Work (physics · Engineering · History · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal principles and applications

  • Interactions and Identities in UK Asylum Appeals

    Open Access•Jessica Hambly•Asylum Determination in Europe•2019

  • Pandemic Evictions

    Sarah Bühler•Journal of Law and Social Policy•2021

  • Handmaidens, partners or go-betweens

    Open Access•Linda Mulcahy, ANNA TSALAPATANIS•Oñati Socio-legal Series•2023

  • Does the teaming of career street-level bureaucrats and lay officials promote street-level resolutions that favour the citizens’ claims

    Open Access•Sagi Gershgoren, Nissim Cohen•Public Management Review•2024

  • Birthright Citizens

    Martha S Jones•Birthright citizens•2018

  • In-Court Judicial Behaviours, Gender and Legitimacy

    Kathy Mack, Sharyn Roach Anleu•Griffith Law Review•2012

  • Are Judges Street-Level Bureaucrats? Evidence from French and Canadian Family Courts

    Open Access•Émilie Biland, Hélène Steinmetz•Law & Social Inquiry•2016

  • Street-Level Bias

    Open Access•Sagi Gershgoren, Nissim Cohen•The American Review of Public…•2023

  • Researching the Judiciary

    Open Access•Caroline Hunter, Judy Nixon et al.•Journal of Law and Society•2008

  • Actor‐network Theory, Implementation, and the Private Landlord

    Open Access•D Cowan, Helen Carr•Journal of Law and Society•2008

  • Cognitive Biases in Street‐Level Resolutions

    Open Access•Sagi Gershgoren, Ofek Edri-Peer et al.•Public Administration•2024

  • Judging gender in tort thresholds

    Genevieve Grant, Genevieve M Grant•Griffith Law Review•2016

  • Neither the Magic Bullet Nor the Big Bad Wolf

    Open Access•Émilien Colaux, Nathalie Schiffino et al.•Administration & Society•2023

  • Asylum Determination in Europe

    Open Access•Nick Gill, Anthony Good•Asylum Determination in Europe•2018

  • Judging in lower courts

    Open Access•Rosemary Hunter, Sharyn Roach Anleu et al.•International Journal of Law in…•2016

  • Countries you go, asylum adjudication you find.” Asylum appeals implementation arrangements, actors' discretion, and organizational practices

    Open Access•Cristina Dallara, Alice Lacchei•Review of Policy Research•2024

  • Performing Authority

    Open Access•Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack•Journal of Sociology•2013

  • Eviction as infrastructure

    Alex Baker•City•2020

  • It's good to talk’ – judicial allocation decision making and the Family Court

    Ann Potter, Kathryne Newton et al.•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2015

  • Deservingness on Trial

    Open Access•Yael Cohen‐Rimer, Netanel Dagan•Social & Legal Studies•2022

  • Judges and Their Work

    Open Access•Nigel G Fielding, Nigel Fielding•Social & Legal Studies•2011

  • The Limits of Procedural Discretion

    Open Access•Nick Gill, Rebecca Rotter et al.•Social & Legal Studies•2017

  • Justice Through Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Marina Kurkchiyan•Social & Legal Studies•2013

  • Does Public Accreditation Promote More State-Friendly Decisions at the Street Level

    Open Access•Sagi Gershgoren, Nissim Cohen•Administration & Society•2024

  • Does appealability foster more citizen‐friendly decisions at the street level

    Open Access•Sagi Gershgoren, Nissim Cohen•Regulation & Governance•2023

  • Street‐Level Bureaucracy, Interprofessional Relations, and Coping Mechanisms

    Open Access•Sharon Halliday, Simon Halliday et al.•Law & Policy•2009

  • Legal Compliance in Street‐Level Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Caroline Hunter, Joanne Bretherton et al.•Law & Policy•2016

  • Lay people in court

    Open Access•Nigel G Fielding, Nigel Fielding•British Journal of Sociology•2013

  • Mediatory Versus Legalistic Discourse in Chinese Courts

    Open Access•Xin He, Luoyun Li et al.•PoLAR Political and Legal…•2017

  • The Common Place of Law

    Patricia Ewick, Susan S Silbey•The Common Place of Law•1998

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy

    Michael Lipsky•Michigan Law Review•1981

  • Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law

    Robert H Mnookin, Lewis A Kornhauser et al.•The Yale Law Journal•1979

  • From ‘What?’ to ‘So What?’

    Nicholas Blomley•Law and geography•2003

  • Cops, Teachers, Counselors

    Steven Maynard-Moody, Steven Maynard‐moody et al.•Cops, Teachers, Counselors•2003

  • Poverty, Ideology and Legality

    Tony Prosser•British Journal of Law and Society•1977

  • The Distribution of an Urban Public Service

    Open Access•Kenneth R Mladenka•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1989

  • The social rented sector, housing and the welfare state in the UK

    Alan Murie•Housing Studies•1997

  • Magistrates' Everyday Work and Emotional Labour

    Open Access•Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack•Journal of Law and Society•2005

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion

    Tony Evans•The British Journal of Social Work•2004

  • From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies

    Open Access•Mark Bovens, Stavros Zouridis•Public Administration Review•2002

  • Political power beyond the State

    Nikolas Rose, Peter Miller•British Journal of Sociology•1992

  • The Dynamics of Informal Procedure

    Open Access•Richard Lempert•Law & Society Review•1989

  • "Docket Data and "Local Knowledge

    Open Access•Richard Lempert•Law & Society Review•1990

  • Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead

    Open Access•M Galanter•Law & Society Review•1974

  • Arts and Crafts

    Howard S Becker•American Journal of Sociology•1978

Obras citantes distintas29
Citações por ano1,61
Intervalo de citações2008 - 2024 (17)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 29
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae