The impact of managed competition on diversity, innovation and creativity in the delivery of home-care services

Reforming publicly funded healthcare systems by introducing elements of competition, often by allowing for-profit providers to compete with not-for-profit providers, is a strategy that has become commonplace in Western democracies. It is widely thought that the competitive forces of the marketplace will lead to greater efficiency, diversity and even innovation in the delivery of services. Between 1997 and 2000, a model of 'managed competition' was introduced as a major reform to the delivery of home-care services in Ontario, Canada. It was expected that by allowing greater competition within the home-care sector, this model would constrain costs and encourage provider agencies to become more innovative and creative in meeting service delivery needs. The purpose of this case study is to explore the impact of the managed competition reform on the for-profit and the not-for-profit organisations that provided rehabilitation home-care services, and, more specifically, to assess the extent to which the goal of greater diversity, innovation and creativity was achieved following implementation of the reform. A purposive sample of 49 key informants were selected for in-depth interviews, and a survey of the 36 organisations that provided rehabilitation home-care services and the 43 community care access centres that purchased services from these provider agencies was conducted. Data were collected between November 2002 and May 2003. Findings demonstrate that a combination of coercive, mimetic and normative isomorphic pressures have constrained diversity, innovation and creativity within the home-care sector. The implication is that the features that have traditionally distinguished for-profit and not-for-profit provider agencies from each other are rapidly disappearing, and a new hybrid organisational structure is evolving

Business · Competition (biology · Creativity · Diversity (politics · Sociology · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Management and Organizational Studies · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology · Ecology

• Long-Term Care Service Policies in Three Canadian Provinces

  Howard A Palley•International Journal of Canadian…•2013

  Incluir item

• Nonprofit Organizations Becoming Business-Like

  Open Access•Florentine Maier, Michael Meyer et al.•Journal of Voluntary Action…•2014

  Incluir item

• The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields

  P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•Economics meets sociology in…•2004

  Incluir item

• Long-Term Care Goes to Market

  Open Access•A Paul Williams, Jan Barnsley et al.•Canadian Journal on Aging / La…•1999

  Incluir item

• The Sociology of Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors

  P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•1990

  Incluir item

• Being “Business-Like” in a Nonprofit Organization

  Open Access•Raymond A Dart, Raymond Dart•Journal of Voluntary Action…•2004

  Incluir item

• Offloading social care responsibilities

  Open Access•Neil Hanlon, Mark W Rosenberg et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2007

  Incluir item

• Fixing the system? The experience of service users of the quasi-market in disability services in Australia

  Open Access•Pam Spall, Catherine Mcdonald et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2004

  Incluir item

• What Does Canada Profit from the For-Profit Debate on Health Care

  Gillian Currie, Cam Donaldson et al.•Canadian Public Policy•2003

  Incluir item

• The Devils in the Detail

  Open Access•Nicholas Deakin•Social Policy and Administration•1996

  Incluir item

• The Iron Cage Revisited

  P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

  Incluir item

• Exploring limits to market-based reform

  Open Access•Glen E Randall, A Paul Williams•Social Science & Medicine•2006

  Incluir item

• Institutionalized Organizations

  J W Meyer, Brian Rowan•American Journal of Sociology•1977

  Incluir item