Three visions of the bomb

This article argues that, over the decades, Australians have held three different, coherent, long-lived ‘visions’ of nuclear weapons and strategy. Those visions—which we have labelled Menzian, Gortonian and disarmer—compete on four grounds: the role that nuclear weapons play in international order; the doctrine of deterrence; the importance of arms control; and the relevance of nuclear weapons to Australia's specific needs. We believe this ‘textured’ framework provides a richer, more satisfying, and more accurate understanding of Australian nuclear identity, both past and present, than previous scholarship has yielded. Moreover, the competition between the three visions might not be at an end. Changes in international norms, in proliferation rates, in regional strategic dynamics, or even in the deterrence doctrines of the major powers could easily reawaken some old, enduring debates. Australian nuclear identity faces an uncertain future

Aesthetics · Competition (biology · Deterrence theory · Doctrine · Identity (music · Law and economics · Nuclear strategy · Nuclear weapon · Political economy · Political science · Scholarship · Sociology · Vision · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense

• The fuzzy limits of self-reliance

  Stephan Frühling•Australian Journal Of International…•2013

  Incluir item

• US Extended Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Order

  Christine M Leah•Asian Security•2012

  Incluir item

• Opaque Proliferation

  Open Access•Luke Auton•History Compass•2013

  Incluir item

• Institutions, informality, and influence

  Stephan Frühling, Andrew O’neil•Australian Journal of Political…•2020

  Incluir item

• India's Nuclear Posture after Pokhran II

  Open Access•Kanti Bajpai•International Studies•2000

  Incluir item