How Legislators Frame Contentious Megaprojects
Insights from Parliamentary Debates on Letpadaung Mines and Myitsone Dam in Myanmar
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12349698 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Renaud Egreteau (0000-0002-8222-6737, City University of Hong Kong, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 331-351 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-06-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Asian Studies Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1035-7823 • E-ISSN: 1467-8403 |
| Editora | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10357823.2023.2212124 |
| OpenAlex | W4381250376 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 44 |
Little is known about how legislative actors engage with social movements in framing contests over conflictual policy issues. This article investigates the case of Myanmar and enquires into how such framing activity can play out in a resurgent legislature. It focuses on two megaprojects that generated intense public debate during the country’s decade of liberalisation (2011–2021): the Letpadaung mines and the Myitsone dam. It builds on the analysis of the Union legislature’s plenary records across two legislatures to uncover how legislators contextualised and framed such large-scale infrastructure projects and the social conflicts they have caused. The findings reveal that legislators sought to position themselves as informed policy actors, eager to highlight the misconduct of past regimes, while deploying three major frames involving good governance, environmental damage, and injustice related to land expropriation. Yet legislators addressing such megaprojects largely avoided emotionally loaded narratives and nationalistic tropes that other social actors in Myanmar typically mobilised. The findings make a threefold contribution: they enhance our theoretical understanding of how public officials engage in competitive framing processes, advance knowledge of how issue framing was deployed in policymaking during Myanmar’s decade of democratisation, and provide evidence of how its political elites construed controversial megaprojects
Contentious politics · Democracy · Democratization · Framing (construction · Legislature · Liberalization · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social movement · Sociology · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Public Administration
Rural resistance under a golden dictatorship, part 2
Rural resistance under a golden dictatorship, part 1
Sacred politics of Chinese infrastructure
Public Engagement in Belt and Road Projects in Myanmar
Antagonistic framing and the social exclusion of Rohingya in Myanmar’s parliamentary discourses (2011–2021)
The framing function of movement tactics
Global Implications of Development, Disasters and Climate Change
Nationalism and anti-ethno-politics
Seeing Like a State
The politics of Asian fracking
Phasing out or phasing in
A drill by any other name
Autocratic power? Energy megaprojects in the age of democratic backsliding
Contesting China-funded Projects in Cambodia
Multi-causal pathways of public opposition to dam projects in Asia
The Inchoate Legislative Scrutiny of the Myanmar Police Forces
Against the State
Reactive to domestic constraints
Renegotiating Belt and Road cooperation
What Does the Rule of Law Have to do with Democratization (in Myanmar)
Strategies of Successful Anti-Dam Movements
Energy, Governance and Security in Thailand and Myanmar (Burma)
Burmese Attitude toward Chinese
Challenging hydropower development in Myanmar (Burma)
Postcolonial Capitalism and the Politics of Dispossession
Asymmetric bargaining between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone Dam controversy
Confluences amid Conflict
Divergent framing
Framing Theory
Inter-National Conspiracy? Speculating on the Myitsone Dam Controversy in China, Burma, Kachin, and a Displaced Village
Mega-projects as displacements
The Environmental and Post-Environmental Politics of Genetically Modified Crops and Foods
Myanmar's Proactive National Legislature
Seeing Like a StateHow Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
Framing Processes and Social Movements
Official Frames in Social Movement Theory
Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |