Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

When Harms Become Wrongs

Some Comments on the Moral Language of "Oppression" and the Limitations of Moral Theory

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12364910
AutoresJohn D Banja (0000-0002-9464-3298, Emory University, autor correspondente), John Banja (Emory University)
Ano2001
Volume12
Fascículo2
Páginas79-86
Data de publicação2001-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Disability Policy Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1044-2073 • E-ISSN: 1538-4802
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/104420730101200204
OpenAlexW2066923957
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas12

This article explores some of the moral language of oppression, especially as it rests on a distinction between harms and wrongs. Authentic instances of oppression are always wrongful, but might not be harmful in certain cases. The analytic challenge is to determine when an allegation of oppression is true or merits public attention as opposed to when allegations of oppression are not socially compelling. Because the language of oppression frequently looks to rights, those controversies that surround rights legislation or its creation also affect and complicate our understanding of oppression. An especially difficult question is how much burden would be "reasonable" for X to bear if creating a right for Y imposes a burden on X—such as having to pay additional taxes to make public transportation accessible. This article suggests that moral theory cannot provide an answer. Rather, this question can only be answered according to the potential that exists for a social consensus that such and such a burden ought to be borne. When that consensus occurs, however, then so has moral progress occurred. Consequently, rather than connoting a heightened capacity for ethical reflection and analysis, moral progress is better understood as a politically based sensibility that moves from socioeconomic narcissism and class isolationism toward social inclusion and tolerating social difference

Allegation · Environmental ethics · Isolationism · Law and economics · Oppression · Political science · Politics · Public reason · Sociology · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education

  • Whose Justice? Which Rationality?

    Alasdair Macintyre•New Social Theory Reader•2020

  • The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law Volume 1

    Joel Feinberg•Harm to Others (Moral Limits for…•1987

  • The Foundations of Bioethics

    H Tristram Engelhardt•The foundations of bioethics•1996

  • Just Health Care

    Open Access•Norman Daniels•Just Health Care•1985

  • The Struggle for the Soul of Health Insurance

    Deborah A Stone•Journal of Health Politics Policy…•1993

  • Justice as Fairness

    John Rawls•Equality and Liberty•1991

  • The Many Faces of Competency

    James F Drane•The Hastings Center Report•1985

  • Justice and the Politics of Difference

    Danielle S Allen, Iris Marion Young•Justice and the Politics of…•2012

  • Employment and Health Benefits

    Brigitte C Madrian, Marilyn J Field et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1995

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão

Ferramentas

Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae