Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Craniofacial morphology, diet and incisor use in three native American populations

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12371507
AutoresMark A Spencer (0000-0002-6209-3113, University of Colorado Denver, autor correspondente), Peter S Ungar (0000-0002-5936-471X, University of Arkansas at Fayetteville)
Ano2000
Volume10
Fascículo4
Páginas229-241
Data de publicação2000-07-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational Journal of Osteoarchaeology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1047-482X • E-ISSN: 1099-1212
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/1099-1212(200007/08)10:4<229::aid-oa524>3.3.co;2-6
OpenAlexW4253433522
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas5

It has been difficult to infer behaviours related to anterior tooth use in fossil hominids owing to a lack of broad-based comparative studies of the relationships between front tooth use and craniodental features in modern humans. In this study, we seek to establish such a neontological baseline by exploring aspects of craniodental form among populations of recent humans that are inferred to have differed in habitual levels of ingestive and paramasticatory processing using the incisors. Morphometric data are compared among samples from three human populations: Aleutian Islanders (n=25); Arikara from the Mobridge Site, SD (n=19); and a late Woodland Bluff group from Jersey County, IL (n=24). Data for various biomechanically relevant dimensions were collected using standard callipers, while three-dimensional (3D) coordinate data for 28 cranial landmarks were recorded using a video-based image analysis system. These data indicate that several aspects of cranial form thought to influence the efficiency of force production on the incisors differ among the examined groups, including the positions and size of the primary masticatory muscles and the position of the dentition. For most dimensions, the Aleut sample exhibits the most mechanically advantageous configuration, the Illinois Bluff group the least advantageous configuration, while the Arikara are intermediate in form. This pattern corresponds to differences in the intensity of incisor loading among these groups, as inferred from both ethnographic reports and incisor microwear data. These results, therefore, suggest that cranial form in humans varies with subsistence-related differences in masticatory force production and that quantitative studies of masticatory system configuration may provide useful information for studies of hominid palaeobiology. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Biology · Craniofacial · Dentition · Incisor · Masticatory force · Skull · Dentistry · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Medicine · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Primate Behavior and Ecology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Anatomy · Ecology · Orthodontics

  • Compact bone distribution and biomechanics of early hominid mandibles

    Open Access•David J Daegling, Frederick E Grine•American Journal of Physical…•1991

  • The Aleutian and Commander Islands and Their Inhabitants

    Open Access•Edward Moffat Weyer, Aleš Hrdlička•Geographical Review•1945

  • Certain Bluff Mounds of Western Jersey County, Illinois

    Open Access•Paul F Titterington•American Antiquity•1935

  • On the Emergence of Modern Humans

    Philip G Chase, Harold L Dibble et al.•Current Anthropology•1990

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae