Registering Theory-Based Predictions in Political Science
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12377592 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Amy Chasteen Miller (0000-0001-5634-9699, United States Naval Academy, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 155-161 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-10-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1049096524000404 |
| OpenAlex | W4403775120 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
How can political scientists rigorously evaluate the predictive power of theories? Many peer-reviewed political science articles include predictions about future outcomes, and scholars make predictions on social media and other public forums. The prevalence of predictions suggests that scholars recognize the utility of leveraging theories for this purpose; however, the predictions often are not made in a manner that allows for rigorously evaluating their accuracy. Building on the increasing popularity of study preregistration in the social sciences, this article proposes “prediction registration” as a means for scholars to publish falsifiable, systematic, and verifiable theory-based predictions. Increasing the rigor of predictive theory testing can advance often-circular debates about accuracy and presents a “win-win” for scholars who aim to test the predictive power of theories. With a more rigorous approach, correct predictions would better demonstrate a theory’s ability to forecast outcomes, and missed predictions would reveal information that can be used to calibrate the theory
Data science · Economics · Epistemology · Falsifiability · Management science · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Positive economics · Power (physics · Predictive power · Publication · Test (biology · Verifiable secret sharing · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Science Research and Education
Essays in positive economics
The preregistration revolution
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
The Campbell Collection of Presidential Election Forecasts, 1984–2016
Can We Predict Politics? Toward What End
Predicting the duration of the Syrian insurgency
Exploring the Past, Anticipating the Future
Forecasting in International Relations
What Makes Foreign Policy Teams Tick
Polisci Twitter
The Perils of Predicting Proliferation
Predicting Armed Conflict, 2010-20501
One without the Other? Prediction and Policy in International Studies
Learning to Predict Proliferation
Machine Learning for Social Science
The Future is a Moving Target
Is International Relations a Global Discipline? Hegemony, Insularity, and Diversity in the Field
Introduction to Forecasting the 2020 US Elections
International studies in an unpredictable world
God Gave Physics the Easy Problems
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |