Democratic Innovation or Inertia? Ideology and Electoral Competition in Luxembourg Political Parties’ Engagement with the 2022 Climate Assembly
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12378924 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Emilien Paulis (0000-0001-5954-4182, University of Luxembourg, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 107-111 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-11-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s104909652500040x |
| OpenAlex | W4416199085 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 24 |
Citizens’ Assemblies (CAs) are a specific form of deliberative mini-publics that are increasingly used to address complex policy challenges, especially in climate governance (Boswell, Dean, and Smith 2023; Smith 2024; Willis, Curato, and Smith, 2022). They involve randomly selected citizens who deliberate and provide policy recommendations (Curato 2021). However, their implementation and uptake largely depend on political parties and elites, which may perceive these novel instruments as challenging their authority (Elstub and Escobar 2019; Setälä 2017). Given the growing use of deliberative mini-publics by representative institutions (Paulis et al. 2021), research has explored their interaction with political parties (Gherghina 2024; Gherghina, Soare, and Jacquet 2020a)
Climate governance · Climate policy · Competition (biology · Corporate governance · Democracy · Ideology · Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Public Administration and Political Analysis · Social Media and Politics
Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance
We Need To Talk About Climate
Citizens call for sufficiency and regulation — A comparison of European citizen assemblies and National Energy and Climate Plans
Limited Congruence
Deliberative democracy and the climate crisis
Deliberative democracy and political parties
The Politicize Dataset
The PSOE’s deliberation and democratic innovations in turbulent times for the social democracy
Integrating citizen deliberation into climate governance
(Slightly) different objectives, but similar results
More competent thus more legitimate? MPs’ discourses on deliberative mini-publics
Political parties and deliberation
Too little, too vague
Parliamentarians' Support for Direct and Deliberative Democracy in Europe
Intra-party democracy beyond aggregation
Sortition, its advocates and its critics
Connecting deliberative mini‐publics to representative decision making
Birds of a feather flock together
Participatory Institutions and Political Ideologies
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |