Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

C hallenges for D emocratization in C entral A sia

W hat C an the U nited S tates D o

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12415412
AutoresPınar İpek (0009-0007-9909-0294, Bilkent University, autor correspondente), Pinar Ipek
Ano2007
Volume14
Fascículo1
Páginas95-106
Data de publicação2007-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMiddle East Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1061-1924 • E-ISSN: 1475-4967
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1475-4967.2007.00287.x
OpenAlexW2036942646
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas2

T he agenda of post-communist transformation seemed to have faded away in Central Asian countries until the tragic terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.In the aftermath of the Iraq War, democratization in "failed" and authoritarian states has rapidly become the focus of U.S. foreign policy.Since the events in Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia has been added to the debate on third-wave democratization that has been witnessed in Georgia and Ukraine.In light of the increasing turbulence in Iraq and the unexpected death of Turkmenistan's President Niyazov, the challenges for democratization in Central Asia should be reevaluated.This article argues that the prospects for democracy in that region are vulnerable to internal and external actors as well as structural problems in the individual states, which possess vast energy resources and crucial routes for exporting them.Thus, to avoid the error of coddling dictators to serve its agenda, the United States should consider developing a longer-term policy that takes into consideration not only the strategic importance of Central Asia, but also the development of its civil society. STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONSFor much of the 1990s, U.S. economic assistance to the region was delivered under the auspices of the Freedom Support Act, but levels of funding fluctuated. 1 Assistance has increased with the implementation of Operation Enduring Freedom. 2 Transferring nuclear weapons out of Kazakhstan and preventing Iran's involvement in oil and gas projects in the region were the priorities of U.S. foreign policy in the 1990s. 3 The post-September 11 rhetoric of U.S. foreign policy insists that democracy is essential to the undermining of conditions that engender terrorism.However, the strategy of the Bush administration, at least for now, is largely focused on the military aspect of the global war on terrorism.The presence of the U.S. airbase outside the Manas Airport in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan -despite the removal of

Citation · Democracy · Library science · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East

  • Outcomes and strategies in the ‘New Great Game

    Open Access•Karen Smith Stegen, Julia Kusznir•Journal of Eurasian Studies•2015

  • Internal and external factors in the democratization of Azerbaijan

    Aytan Gahramanova•Democratization•2009

  • Changing security threat perceptions in Central Asia

    Kirill Nourzhanov•Australian Journal Of International…•2009

  • Azerbaijan's Foreign policy and Challenges for Energy Security

    Pınar İpek, Pinar Ipek•The Middle East Journal•2009

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • The United States and central Asia

    Svante E Cornell, Svante Cornell•Cambridge Review of International…•2004

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano0,24
Intervalo de citações2009 - 2015 (7)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae