Determinants of online professor reviews
An elaboration likelihood model perspective
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12420746 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yaojie Li (0000-0001-9698-6879, University of New Orleans, autor correspondente), Xuan Wang (0000-0002-7173-0962, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley), Craig Van Slyke (0000-0003-3924-1859, Louisiana Tech University) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 2086-2108 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-12-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Internet Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657 |
| Editora | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/intr-11-2020-0627 |
| OpenAlex | W4313502589 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 70 |
Purpose Drawing on the elaboration likelihood model (ELM), the authors examine the influence of perceived professor teaching qualities, as central cues, on online professor ratings. Also, our study investigates how the volume and period of reviews, as peripheral cues, affect online professor ratings. Design/methodology/approach Leveraging stratified random sampling, the authors collect reviews of 892 Information Systems professors from 250 American universities. The authors employ regression models while conducting robustness tests through multi-level logistic regression and causal inference methods. Findings Our results suggest that the central route from perceived professor qualities to online professor ratings is significant, including most qualitative pedagogical factors except positive assessment. In addition to course difficulty, the effect of the peripheral route is limited due to deficient diagnosticity. Research limitations/implications Our primary concern about the data validity is a lack of a competing and complementary dataset. However, an institutional evaluation survey or an experimental study can corroborate our findings in future research. Practical implications Online professor review sites can enhance their perceived diagnosticity and credibility by increasing review vividness and promoting site interactivity. In addition to traditional institutional evaluations, professors can obtain insightful feedback from review sites to improve their teaching effectiveness. Originality/value To our best knowledge, this study is the first attempt to employ the ELM and accessibility-diagnosticity theory in explicating the information processing of online professor reviews. It also sheds light on various determinants and routes to persuasion, thus providing a novel theoretical perspective on online professor reviews
Creativity · Credibility · Elaboration likelihood model · Epistemology · Generalizability theory · Inference · Interactivity · Originality · Perception · Perspective (graphical · Persuasion · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Computer Science · Online and Blended Learning · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Student Rating Myths Versus Research Facts from 1924 to 1998
Students' evaluations of university teaching
Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students' evaluations of teaching
Self-Selection and Information Role of Online Product Reviews
Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school
Causal inference in statistics
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects
The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication
Do online reviews matter? — An empirical investigation of panel data
Understanding the perceived quality of professors’ teaching effectiveness in various disciplines
Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor
Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness
How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations
Web-based student evaluations of professors
Attractiveness, easiness and other issues
RateMyProfessors.com offers biased evaluations
A Systematic Review of Propensity Score Methods in the Social Sciences
Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings
Computer-Mediated Word-of-Mouth Communication on RateMyProfessors.com
The impact of electronic word‐of‐mouth
I liked your course because you taught me well
Educational Policy and Practice From the Perspective of Institutional Theory
Promoting engagement in online courses
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion
Students' perceptions of teaching quality in higher education
Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |