To Ban or Not to Ban

This study explores the conditions under which China complies with the international norms of banning the trade in endangered species using tiger bones and ivory cases. Why did China ban the ivory trade but attempt to allow the trade in tiger derivatives? The authors traced the key policies formulated by Chinese policymakers during 1981–2018. Drawing upon norm localization theory, the authors find that domestic policy preferences played a key role in linking domestic and international norms. Chinese policymakers actively chose ideas to advance their policy preferences, and this localization process reaches beyond a static fitting process between domestic-international norms. This finding has implications for wildlife policies in developing countries and sheds light on China’s wildlife policy development following the outbreak of coronavirus

Biology · Business · China · Endangered species · International trade · Norm (philosophy · Political science · Tiger · Wildlife · Wildlife trade · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology · Law · Primate Behavior and Ecology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology

• When does China change its mind? Accounting for Beijing’s shark finning ban

  Stephen Noake, Stephen Noakes•The Pacific Review•2026

  Incluir item

• Illicit Parallel Trading, State Permission, and Legality

  Open Access•Lawrence Ka-Ki Ho, Kuoray Mao et al.•Journal of Contemporary Asia•2026

  Incluir item