Introduction
Growing pains — China debates its international future
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12422753 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yong Deng (0000-0001-9286-2123, autor correspondente), Sherry Gray |
| Ano | 2001 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Fascículo | 26 |
| Páginas | 5-16 |
| Data de publicação | 2001-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Contemporary China (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1067-0564 • E-ISSN: 1469-9400 |
| Editora | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10670560123441 |
| OpenAlex | W2099154079 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
Liberal democracies in North America, Europe, and Japan have coalesced into a global power center with shared in-group values and a common foreign policy outlook. Despite its growing materialist capacities, China finds itself hardly closer to the great power center, perceiving itself instead condemned to the periphery and victimized by the assertion of the emerging global center. Confronted with this predicament, Chinese intellectuals and policy elites have debated over how China should relate to the world and the United States. Their answer remains uncertain, as China is still struggling to find the way out of the periphery. However, so long as it believes that the great power club is open to its membership, China will likely continue to try to live up to its self-identification as a responsible power
Assertion · Center (category theory · China · Club · Development economics · Economics · Foreign policy · Great power · Materialism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,23 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2004 - 2009 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |