A case for ranking heterodox journals and departments
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12428166 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Frederic S Lee (University of Missouri–Kansas City, autor correspondente) |
| Editores | Wolfram Elsner (0000-0001-6678-7879) |
| Ano | 2008 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 241-251 |
| Data de publicação | 2008-09-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1074-8121 • E-ISSN: 2054-1708 |
| Editora | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/10748120810912565 |
| OpenAlex | W2038518083 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 12 |
| Referências citadas | 13 |
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present, for the first time, a case for ranking heterodox journals and departments. Design/methodology/approach The first section of the article briefly delineates the intellectual and social organization of heterodox economics as a social system of scientific activity. This background is then used to argue the case for ranking heterodox journals (section two) and heterodox departments (section three). An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero‐sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated in the fourth section. The final section summarizes the case for rankings. Findings There are two central issues facing heterodox economics: one is the development of a coherent, integrated economic theory that explains the social provisioning process; and the second is the making of economic departments that contribute to the development of heterodox theory and policy, and the training of heterodox economists. A case can be made for ranking journals and departments that deal with the two issues. Originality/value An example of ranking journals that promote the development of heterodox theory, is not a zero‐sum game, and does not invite invidious comparisons is delineated
Citation · Economics · Journal ranking · Originality · Political science · Positive economics · Ranking (information retrieval · Section (typography · Social science · Sociology · Statistics · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Economic theories and models · Economic Theory and Institutions · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Mathematics
Some Critical Notes on Citation Metrics and Heterodox Economics
The controversial policies of journal ratings
Revues qui comptent, revues qu’on compte
Journal citation among heterodox economists 1995‐2007
A Case Study of Pluralism in Economics
Different but Equal? On the Contribution of Dissident Economists
Increasing the Impact of Heterodox Work
The Diffusion of Heterodox Economics
Ranking Economics Departments in a Contested Discipline
Research Quality Rankings of Heterodox Economic Journals in a Contested Discipline
Heterodox Economics and the Scientist's Role in Society
Citation Metrics
Ranking and the prospects of heterodox economics in Greece
Heterodox economics and the future of academic publishing
Heterodox economics and dissemination of research through the internet
News from down under
Journals as constituents of scientific discourse
Peer Review, the Research Assessment Exercise and the Demise of Non-Mainstream Economics
The Journals of Economics
Research Selectivity, Managerialism, and the Academic Labor Process
| Obras citantes distintas | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2008 - 2018 (11) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 12 |