Reframing Violence Against Women as a Human Rights Violation
Evan Stark’s Coercive Control
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12437620 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kathryn Libal (0000-0001-7604-2352, University of Connecticut, West Hartford,, autor correspondente), Serena Parekh (0000-0002-0148-6570, University of Connecticut, Storrs) |
| Ano | 2009 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Fascículo | 12 |
| Páginas | 1477-1489 |
| Data de publicação | 2009-10-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Violence Against Women (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1077-8012 • E-ISSN: 1552-8448 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1077801209346958 |
| PMID | 19834069 |
| OpenAlex | W2132958792 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 16 |
| Referências citadas | 11 |
Evan Stark claims that partner-perpetrated physical abuse and other forms of violence against women ought to be understood as a human rights violation. The authors engage Stark's rhetorically powerful political and analytical innovation by outlining one theoretical and one practical challenge to shifting the paradigm that researchers, advocates, and policy makers use to describe, explain, and remedy the harms of coercive control from misdemeanor assault to human rights violation. The theoretical challenge involves overcoming the public/ private dichotomy that underpins liberal conceptions of human rights.The practical challenge involves using the human rights framework in the United States, given public indifference to human rights rhetoric or law, reluctance of U.S. policy makers to submit to scrutiny or justice-oriented processes under international law on issues of human rights and especially war crimes, and the consequent U.S. legacy of refusal to participate meaningfully in the international human rights process. The authors conclude that employing a human rights framework holds potential in the United States, but the paradigm shift Stark advocates will not materialize without widespread mobilization of interest in and understanding of human rights among domestic violence advocates and the society in general
Cognitive reframing · Domestic violence · Fundamental rights · Human rights · International human rights law · Poison control · Political science · Reservation of rights · Right to property · Sociology · Suicide prevention · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
Gender Violence
Pequeñas inflexiones
Domestic Violence
The sociological significance of domestic violence
Human Rights in the Practice of Family Therapy
Exploring Factors Shaping Primary Health Care Readiness to Respond to Family Violence
Feeling my Sister’s Pain”
A feminist reconceptualisation of intimate partner violence against women
It’s a work in progress’
Is more law the answer? Seeking justice for victims of intimate partner violence through the reform of legal categories
Intimate Partner Violence and Location of Birth
Domestic Violence and the Feminization of Homelessness in Malta
Reframing sexual violence against Indigenous women as genocide
How Neoliberalism Shapes the Role and Responsibility of Faculty Members for Eliminating Sexual Violence
Why Domestic Violence is a Central Issue for Sociology and Social Theory
Rotas críticas de mulheres em situação de violência
In an Abusive State
“You Can't Bite the Hand . . .”
Justice, Gender and the Family
Human Rights and Gender Violence
The Sexual Contract
Coercive Control
Women's Rights as Human Rights
Domestic Violence and Human Rights
Antifeminism and Family Terrorism
Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation
| Obras citantes distintas | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,07 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2011 - 2024 (14) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 16 |